Citation network
Trammel Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 27, 1980
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Trammel v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 445 U.S. 40 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Trammel v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 445 U.S. 40 (1980) Trammel v. UnitedSearch
-
contention that the admission of his wife's adverse testimony, over his objection, contravened the decision in Hawkins v. UnitedSearch
-
the marital relationship is privileged under the independent rule protecting confidential marital communications, Blau v. UnitedSearch
-
to exclude the voluntary testimony of his wife. 440 U.S. 934 (1979). This calls for a reexamination of Hawkins v. UnitedSearch
-
the admission of the adverse testimony of his wife, over his objection, contravened this Court's teaching in Hawkins v. UnitedSearch
-
It was applied by this Court in Stein v. BowmanSearch
-
Pet. 209, 38 U. S. 220 -223 (1839), in Graves v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 150 U. S. 118 (1893), and again in Jin Fue Mo v. UnitedSearch
-
Indeed, it was not until 1933, in Funk v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 445 U. S. 46 In Hawkins v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 358 U. S. 78 . Accord, Wyatt v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Fed.Rule Evid. 501. Cf. Wolfle v. UnitedSearch
-
Francis v. SouthernSearch
-
because the laws of marriage and domestic relations are concerns traditionally reserved to the states. See Sosna v. IowaSearch
-
Elkins v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 364 U. S. 206 , 364 U. S. 234 (1960) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting). Accord, United States v. NixonSearch
-
Those confidences are privileged under the independent rule protecting confidential marital communications. Blau v. UnitedSearch
-
a grant of immunity and assurances of lenient treatment does not render her testimony involuntary. Cf. Bordenkircher v. HayesSearch
-
This Court recognized just such a confidential marital communications privilege in Wolfle v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 291 U. S. 7 (1934), and in Blau v. UnitedSearch
-
It has been expanded since then to include crimes against the spouse's property, see Herman v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 220 F.2d 219, 226 (CA4 1955), and, in recent years, crimes against children of either spouse, United States v. AllerySearch
-
Hawkins v. UnitedSearch
-
See Zorach v. ClausonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Trammel v. UnitedSearch
-
Blau v. UnitedSearch
-
of Hawkins v. UnitedSearch
-
Graves v. UnitedSearch
-
Jin Fue Mo v. UnitedSearch
-
Funk v. UnitedSearch
-
In Hawkins v. UnitedSearch
-
Accord, Wyatt v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Wolfle v. UnitedSearch
-
See Sosna v. IowaSearch
-
Accord, United States v. NixonSearch
-
Cf. Bordenkircher v. HayesSearch
-
Wolfle v. UnitedSearch
-
Herman v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. AllerySearch
-
Stanton v. StantonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial