Citation network
Branti Vs. Finkel
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 31, 1980
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 507 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Branti v. FinkelSearch
-
U.S. 507 (1980) Branti v. FinkelSearch
-
beliefs, the District Court held that those discharges would be permissible under this Court's decision in Elrod v. BurnsSearch
-
first, that the holding in Elrod v. BurnsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
it is an acceptable requirement for an assistant public defender. Page 445 U. S. 513 I In Elrod v. BurnsSearch
-
in Page 445 U. S. 514 his opinion, brought the practice within the rule of cases like Board of Education v. BarnetteSearch
-
unconstitutional condition on the receipt of a public benefit, and therefore came within the rule of cases like Perry v. SindermannSearch
-
could not command directly.' Speiser v. RandallSearch
-
teacher's one-year contract may not be predicated on his exercise of First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Shelton v. TuckerSearch
-
Keyishan v. BoardSearch
-
comment on the first branch of MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN's analysis, but expressly relied on the same passage from Perry v. SindermannSearch
-
that is quoted above. Petitioner argues that Elrod v. BurnsSearch
-
respondents in any event due to their lack of competence as public defenders. See Mt. Healthy City Board of Ed. v. DoyleSearch
-
we decline to review these and other findings of fact petitioner argues were clearly erroneous. See Graver Mfg. Co. v. LindeSearch
-
rehired when control of the office shifted to the Democratic Party. A similar waiver argument was rejected in Elrod v. BurnsSearch
-
s views and ultimately his own beliefs, and any assessment of his salary is tantamount to coerced belief. See Buckley v. ValeoSearch
-
of the nature of the inducement, whether it be by the denial of public employment or, as in Board of Education v. BarnetteSearch
-
The Court recognized in United Public Workers v. MitchellSearch
-
This principle was reaffirmed in Wieman v. UpdegraffSearch
-
to establish their loyalty by extracting an oath denying past affiliation with Communists. And in Cafeteria Workers v. McElroySearch
-
the deputy of such an official could be dismissed on grounds of political party affiliation or loyalty. Cf. Newcomb v. BrennanSearch
-
course, free to discharge them. MR. JUSTICE STEWART, dissenting. I joined the judgment of the Court in Elrod v. BurnsSearch
-
joins as to Part I, dissenting. The Court today continues the evisceration of patronage practices begun in Elrod v. BurnsSearch
-
Page 445 U. S. 523 In Elrod v. BurnsSearch
-
U. S. 409 , 424 U. S. 423 (1976), quoting Pearson v. ReedSearch
-
Board of Education v. BarnetteSearch
-
U. S. 624 , 319 U. S. 642 (1943). The Court also relies upon the decisions in Perry v. SindermannSearch
-
U. S. 593 (1972), and Keyishian v. BoardSearch
-
Elrod v. BurnsSearch
-
further sufficiently important interests to justify tangential burdening of First Amendment rights. See Buckley v. ValeoSearch
-
a constitutional reason for prohibiting them from delegating that same authority to legislators and appointed officials. v. TheSearch
-
use of patronage in the early days of our Republic played an important role in democratizing American politics. Elrod v. BurnsSearch
-
CSC v. LetterSearch
-
compelling each public school student to pledge allegiance to the flag violated the First Amendment. Similarly, Wieman v. UpdegraffSearch
-
U. S. 183 (1952), Shelton v. TuckerSearch
-
U. S. 479 (1960), and Cafeteria Workers v. McElroySearch
-
or dismiss employees pursuant to an established patronage system. The Court also relies upon United Public Workers v. MitchellSearch
-
have been a means of upward mobility for newcomers to the United States and members of minority groups. See Elrod v. BurnsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Branti v. FinkelSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial