Citation network
Payton Vs. New York
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 15, 1980
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Payton v. NewSearch
-
York - 445 U.S. 573 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Payton v. NewSearch
-
York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980) Payton v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 583 -590. (b) The reasons for upholding warrantless arrests in a public place, cf. United States v. WatsonSearch
-
trend, and there is by no means the kind of virtual unanimity on this question that was present in United States v. WatsonSearch
-
question presented by this challenge has been expressly left open in a number of our prior opinions. In United States v. WatsonSearch
-
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment, Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
and that the search of the immediate Page 445 U. S. 579 area was reasonable under Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
note that the warrantless arrest of a person is a species of seizure required by the Amendment to be reasonable. Beck v. OhioSearch
-
U. S. 89 . Cf. Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 48 . Indeed, as MR. JUSTICE POWELL noted in his concurrence in United States v. WatsonSearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
-
a warrantless seizure in an open area and such a seizure on private premises was plainly stated in G. M. Leasing Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
now before us for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sitting en banc, Dorman v. UnitedSearch
-
F.2d 412, 423 (1978), cert. denied sub nom. Goldsmith v. UnitedSearch
-
be searched is broader when executing a search warrant than when executing an arrest warrant in the home. See Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Silverman v. UnitedSearch
-
that threshold may not reasonably be crossed without a warrant. III Without contending that United States v. WatsonSearch
-
See Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
for trespass or false arrest, in which a constable's authority to make the arrest was a defense. See, e.g., Leach v. MoneySearch
-
officer was acting within the bounds of his authority. See M. Foster, Crown Law 308, 312 (1762). See also West v. CabellSearch
-
Page 445 U. S. 596 Further, Hale appears to rely solely on a statement in an early Yearbook, quoted in Burdett v. AbbotSearch
-
prevailing practice was not to make such arrests except in hot pursuit or when authorized by a warrant. Cf. Agnello v. UnitedSearch
-
is clear, there is by no means the kind of virtual unanimity on this question that was present in United States v. WatsonSearch
-
for the Watson holding finds no counterpart in this case. MR. JUSTICE POWELL,, concurring in United States v. WatsonSearch
-
Together with No. 78-5421, Riddick v. NewSearch
-
United States v. WatsonSearch
-
Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 357 U. S. 493 , 357 U. S. 499 -500. Cf. United States v. SantanaSearch
-
See State v. PerezSearch
-
See State v. CookSearch
-
People v. RameySearch
-
People v. MorenoSearch
-
State v. JonesSearch
-
State v. PlattenSearch
-
Commonwealth v. FordeSearch
-
State v. OlsonSearch
-
Commonwealth v. WilliamsSearch
-
State v. McNealSearch
-
Laasch v. StateSearch
-
Compare United States v. ReedSearch
-
F.2d 412 (CA2 1978), cert. denied sub nom. Goldsmith v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. KillebrewSearch
-
United States v. ShyeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial