Citation network
Baldasar Vs. Illinois
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 22, 1980
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 222 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Baldasar v. IllinoisSearch
-
U.S. 222 (1980) Baldasar v. IllinoisSearch
-
theft conviction. 52 Ill.App.3d 305, 367 N.E.2d 459, reversed and remanded. PER CURIAM. In Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
by a divided vote. It emphasized that, when the right to counsel in misdemeanor cases was recognized in Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE STEWART, with whom MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE STEVENS join, concurring. In Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
counsel in his defense. It seems clear to me that this prison sentence violated the constitutional rule of Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
Brief for Respondent in Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
In Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
Seven years later, in Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
must be provided if imprisonment was an authorized punishment but had not actually been imposed. See Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
in Argersinger. Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
his conviction is not sufficiently reliable to support the severe sanction of imprisonment. Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
U. S. 235 . I do not share that view. Not all misdemeanor defendants, of course, are indigent. See Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
prosecutorial discretion. The economic effect of our decision today will be miniscule compared to that of Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 45 (1932), Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
U. S. 335 (1963), and Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
of a conviction in which he was denied the assistance of counsel. MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN, concurring. In Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
prosecuted for a nonpetty criminal offense, that is, one punishable by more than six months' imprisonment, see Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
Baldwin v. NewSearch
-
or whenever the defendant is convicted of an offense and is actually subjected to a term of imprisonment, Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
best preserve constitutional values, and do so with a measure of clarity for all concerned. Had the Court in Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE WHITE, and MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST join, dissenting. Last Term, in Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 367 (1979), we rejected the claim that Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
only was fined. The circumstances of that conviction, therefore, were precisely like those of the petitioner in Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
has sustained repeat offender laws as penalizing only the last offense committed by the defendant. E.g., Moore v. MissouriSearch
-
misdemeanor conviction. By creating this new hybrid, the Court departs from the position it took after Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
was constitutionally invalid -- and therefore void -- it could not be put to other uses in court. In Burgett v. TexasSearch
-
felony conviction could not be used in a later trial to enhance punishment under a recidivist statute. Loper v. BetoSearch
-
U. S. 483 (1972), barred impeachment of a defendant with such a felony conviction, and United States v. TuckerSearch
-
Despite reservations, I joined the decision in Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
because it was consistent with Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
Today's decision is all the more puzzling in view of the Court's recent ruling in Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
with today's decision. Unlike misdemeanors, all uncounseled felony judgments are constitutionally invalid. Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
U.S. at 445 U. S. 67 , quoting Burgett v. TexasSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Baldasar v. IllinoisSearch
-
PER CURIAM. In Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
In Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
of Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
See Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
Argersinger. Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
See Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
of Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
and Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial