Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Rhode Island Vs. Innis

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 12, 1980

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 35 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 291 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Rhode Island v. Innis
    Search
  2. U.S. 291 (1980) Rhode Island v. Innis
    Search
  3. spotted respondent, who was unarmed, on the street, arrested him, and advised him of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona
    Search
  4. U. S. 307 . Page 446 U. S. 293 MR. JUSTICE STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court. In Miranda v. Arizona
    Search
  5. A.2d 1158. Relying at least in part on this Court's decision in Brewer v. Williams
    Search
  6. under Miranda v. Arizona
    Search
  7. Commonwealth v. Hamilton
    Search
  8. under Miranda is informed by this Court's decision in Brewer v. Williams
    Search
  9. and Fourteenth Amendment right to counsel. 430 U.S. at 430 U. S. 397 -399. That right, as we held in Massiah v. United
    Search
  10. since the policies underlying the two constitutional protections are quite distinct. See Kamisar, Brewer v. Williams
    Search
  11. concurring. I would prefer to reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Brewer v. Williams
    Search
  12. case. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER, concurring in the judgment. Since the result is not inconsistent with Miranda v. Arizona
    Search
  13. II-B of the Court's opinion will not clarify the tension between this holding and Brewer v. Williams
    Search
  14. That we may well be adding to the confusion is suggested by the problem dealt with in California v. Braeseke
    Search
  15. within the meaning of Miranda v. Arizona
    Search
  16. in this case did not constitute interrogation. Page 446 U. S. 309 I As the Court recognizes, Miranda v. Arizona
    Search
  17. by the police. See Michigan v. Mosley
    Search
  18. In Brewer v. Williams
    Search
  19. to refrain from trying to elicit a response from the suspect in the absence of his attorney. See Kamisar, Brewer v. Williams
    Search
  20. U.Pa.L.Rev. 581, 609-611 (1979). As MR. JUSTICE WHITE pointed out in his opinion concurring in the result in Michigan v. Mosley
    Search
  21. a prisoner's answer to a question to waive his right not to have the question asked in the first place. See Brewer v. Williams
    Search
  22. Michigan v. Mosley
    Search
  23. People v. Cunningham
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court Rhode Island v. Innis
    Search
  25. Miranda v. Arizona
    Search
  26. of the Court. In Miranda v. Arizona
    Search
  27. Brewer v. Williams
    Search
  28. Massiah v. United
    Search
  29. See Kamisar, Brewer v. Williams
    Search
  30. and Brewer v. Williams
    Search
  31. California v. Braeseke
    Search
  32. of Miranda v. Arizona
    Search
  33. See Michigan v. Mosley
    Search
  34. See Brewer v. Williams
    Search
  35. People v. Cunningham
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial