Citation network
Andrus Vs. Utah
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 19, 1980
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 500 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Andrus v. UtahSearch
-
U.S. 500 (1980) Andrus v. UtahSearch
-
policy. The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed, Utah v. KleppeSearch
-
did not include any numbered sections known to be mineral in character by the time of survey. United States v. SweetSearch
-
approximate the value of the numbered sections lost. In 1927, some nine years after the decision in United States v. SweetSearch
-
was limited to determining whether the States' indemnity selections met the relevant statutory criteria. See Wyoming v. UnitedSearch
-
Payne v. NewSearch
-
for Indians or federal military purposes, and entries by individuals under the homestead laws. See, e.g., Wisconsin v. LaneSearch
-
See Heydenfeldt v. DaneySearch
-
that it seems clear that, had such an exception been intended, Congress would have made it express. In Wyoming v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MorrisonSearch
-
cross-section of the public land. Title to the sections vested in the State upon approval of the survey. United States v. MorrisonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
lands to other public uses without compensating the trust for the full market value of the interest taken. Lassen v. ArizonaSearch
-
Alamo Land & Cattle Co. v. ArizonaSearch
-
the federal obligation to replace unavailable school sections with indemnity lands of equal acreage. See United States v. MorrisonSearch
-
unsettled question was whether the Secretary of the Interior had discretion to disapprove the selections. In Payne v. NewSearch
-
at 255 U. S. 370 -371. Three weeks later, the Court made the same point even more emphatically in Wyoming v. UnitedSearch
-
the Secretary may reject private applications for land that he finds suitable for more efficient uses. See Bleamaster v. MortonSearch
-
Carl v. UdallSearch
-
not proper for private acquisition because the relevant land grant did not convey lands of that character. See Pallin v. UnitedSearch
-
Finch v. UnitedSearch
-
selection under standards fundamentally inconsistent with the terms of the relevant land grant statutes. See Pallin v. UnitedSearch
-
Bronken v. MortonSearch
-
was admitted to the Union. They guarantee the State a specific quantity of the public lands within its borders. Payne v. NewSearch
-
Mexico, 255 U. S. 367 (1921), and Wyoming v. UnitedSearch
-
Mining Co. v. ConsolidatedSearch
-
United States v. SweetSearch
-
See Todd v. WashingtonSearch
-
that prevents title to numbered school sections from vesting in the States upon completion of a survey. United States v. WyomingSearch
-
Given the Court's concession on this point, its reliance on United States v. WyomingSearch
-
of otherwise unreserved public lands, United States v. WyomingSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Andrus v. UtahSearch
-
Utah v. KleppeSearch
-
See Wyoming v. UnitedSearch
-
Wisconsin v. LaneSearch
-
In Wyoming v. UnitedSearch
-
Lassen v. ArizonaSearch
-
Alamo Land & Cattle Co. v. ArizonaSearch
-
In Payne v. NewSearch
-
Wyoming v. UnitedSearch
-
See Bleamaster v. MortonSearch
-
See Pallin v. UnitedSearch
-
and Wyoming v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MorrisonSearch
-
United States v. SweetSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial