Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Busic Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 19, 1980

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 2 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Bass US Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1971
    Relied / Followed
  2. Preiser Vs. Rodriguez US Supreme Court · May 07, 1973
  3. Busic v. United
    Search
  4. States - 446 U.S. 398 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Busic v. United
    Search
  5. States, 446 U.S. 398 (1980) Busic v. United
    Search
  6. defining the felony he committed. Pp. 446 U. S. 403 -411. (a) This result is supported not only by Simpson v. United
    Search
  7. In an opinion announced Page 446 U. S. 402 before Simpson v. United
    Search
  8. fact that Busic had unlawfully carried a gun. 587 F.2d at 584. Following this Court's decision in Simpson v. United
    Search
  9. TVA v. Hill
    Search
  10. U. S. 336 , 404 U. S. 347 (1971), quoting Rewis v. United
    Search
  11. more specific statute will be given precedence over a more general one, regardless of their temporal sequence. Preiser v. Rodriguez
    Search
  12. In addition to contesting the rule of lenity and specific v. general
    Search
  13. Together with No. 78-6029, LaRocca v. United
    Search
  14. with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE joins, concurring. I join the Court's opinion, holding that the decision in Simpson v. United
    Search
  15. Court's recent pronouncements respecting the multiple punishments aspect of the Double Jeopardy Clause. See Whalen v. United
    Search
  16. Whalen v. United
    Search
  17. is subject to a term of imprisonment in addition to that provided for the felony in question. In Simpson v. United
    Search
  18. NQUIST, dissenting. I dissented from this Court's decision in Simpson v. United
    Search
  19. U. S. 18 . Recently, this Court unanimously rejected Simpson's constitutional premise. In Whalen v. United
    Search
  20. of cumulative punishments in the same criminal proceeding presented no double jeopardy question whatsoever. See Whalen v. United
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court Busic v. United
    Search
  22. Simpson v. United
    Search
  23. Rewis v. United
    Search
  24. LaRocca v. United
    Search
  25. of the Double Jeopardy Clause. See Whalen v. United
    Search
  26. In Simpson v. United
    Search
  27. In Whalen v. United
    Search
  28. See Whalen v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial