Citation network
United States Vs. Mendenhall
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 27, 1980
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 544 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. MendenhallSearch
-
U.S. 544 (1980) United States v. MendenhallSearch
-
from high school, and was a Negro accosted by white officers, while not irrelevant, were not decisive. Cf. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
and asking to see her ticket and identification was a permissible investigative stop under the standards of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
U. S. 1 , and United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
the court concludes that this case is indistinguishable from United States v McCalebSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
and thus was excepted from the requirements of both a warrant and probable cause. See Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
including seizures that involve only a brief detention short of traditional arrest. Davis v. MississippiSearch
-
person and an encounter that intrudes upon no constitutionally protected interest is illustrated by the facts of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Ibid. Similarly, the Court in Sibron v. NewSearch
-
York, 392 U. S. 40 , a case decided the same day as Terry v. OhioSearch
-
escape prosecution, and many crimes would go unsolved. In short, the security of all would be diminished. Haynes v. WashingtonSearch
-
use of language or tone of voice indicating that compliance with the officer's request might be compelled. See Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Dunaway v. PageSearch
-
was it enough to establish a seizure that the person asking the questions was a law enforcement official. See Terry v. OhioSearch
-
inquiry, for the voluntariness of her responses does not depend upon her having been so informed. See Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
statement was self-protective, but rather whether it was made voluntarily. The Court's decision last Term in Brown v. TexasSearch
-
s decisions involving investigatory stops of automobiles do not point in any different direction. In United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
the former amounts to a seizure tells very little about the constitutional status of the latter. See also Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
quoting Sibron v. NewSearch
-
the record, the Court of Appeals was mistaken in substituting for that finding its view of the evidence. See Jackson v. UnitedSearch
-
of duress or coercion, express or implied, is to be determined by the totality of all the circumstances, Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
and is a matter which the Government has the burden of proving. Id. at 412 U. S. 222 , citing Bumper v. NorthSearch
-
unusually threatened by the officers, who were white males. While these factors were not irrelevant, see Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
citing Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
the Court ordinarily does not consider matters neither raised before nor decided by the courts below, see Adickes v. KressSearch
-
Co., 398 U. S. 144 , 398 U. S. 147 , n. 2, it has done so in exceptional circumstances. See Youakim v. MillerSearch
-
Duignan v. UnitedSearch
-
by the questions presented in the petition for certiorari. This Court's Rule 23(1)(c). See Procunier v. NavaretteSearch
-
Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. UniversitySearch
-
legal characterization of the facts appearing in the record is a matter for this Court to determine. See Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
Bumper v. NorthSearch
-
office, where a body search conducted by a female police officer revealed two plastic bags of heroin. II Terry v. OhioSearch
-
the objective facts upon which the law enforcement officer relied in light of his knowledge and expertise. See Brown v. TexasSearch
-
Miami, or New York), agents pay particular attention to passengers who arrive from those places. See United States v. VanSearch
-
Brown v. TexasSearch
-
and the behavior of a suspect who appears to be evading police contact. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
Ante at 446 U. S. 553 , quoting Terry v. OhioSearch
-
For example, in Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. MendenhallSearch
-
Cf. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
and United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
United States v. McCalebSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial