Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Cpsc Vs. Gte Sylvania, Inc.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 09, 1980

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 1 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Chrysler Corp. Vs. Brown US Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1979
  2. Cpsc V. Gte
    Search
  3. Sylvania, Inc. - 447 U.S. 102 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court CPSC v. GTE
    Search
  4. Sylvania, Inc., 447 U.S. 102 (1980) Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE
    Search
  5. S. 206 The relevant facts are set forth in a case decided by this Court earlier this Term, GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers
    Search
  6. be confidential. Not surprisingly, lawsuits were soon filed in several Federal District Courts. See GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers
    Search
  7. U.S. Page 447 U. S. 118 304, 361 U. S. 313 (1960), quoted in United States v. Philadelphia
    Search
  8. of a single legislator who sponsors a bill are not controlling in analyzing legislative history. Chrysler Corp. v. Brown
    Search
  9. is far from authoritative as an expression of congressional will under the oft-quoted factors enunciated in Skidmore v. Swift
    Search
  10. Page 447 U. S. 121 v. Petitioners
    Search
  11. The decision below, 598 F.2d 790 (179), is in direct conflict with Pierce & Stevens Chemical Corp. v. U.S
    Search
  12. are reported at 438 F.Supp. 208 (1977) and 404 F.Supp. 352 (1975). These decisions are discussed in GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers
    Search
  13. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC
    Search
  14. history is sometimes considered relevant, this is because, as Mr. Chief Justice Marshall stated in United States v. Fisher
    Search
  15. See Andrus v. Shell
    Search
  16. is thus arguable that the Commission's interpretation here is primarily litigation inspired. Cf. Davies Warehouse Co. v Bowles
    Search
  17. to overrule the decision of the Supreme Court in Administrator, FAA v. Robertson
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court CPSC v. GTE
    Search
  19. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE
    Search
  20. Term, GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers
    Search
  21. Federal District Courts. See GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers
    Search
  22. United States v. Philadelphia
    Search
  23. Skidmore v. Swift
    Search
  24. Pierce & Stevens Chemical Corp. v. U.S
    Search
  25. GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers
    Search
  26. Cf. Davies Warehouse Co. v. Bowles
    Search
  27. Administrator, FAA v. Robertson
    Search
  28. United States v. Price
    Search
  29. United States v. Fisher
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial