Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Agins Vs. City of Tiburon

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 10, 1980

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 2 linked 35 unlinked
Show
  1. Goldwater Vs. Carter US Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1979
  2. United States Vs. Causby US Supreme Court · May 27, 1946
  3. Agins v. City
    Search
  4. of Tiburon - 447 U.S. 255 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Agins v. City
    Search
  5. of Tiburon, 447 U.S. 255 (1980) Agins v. City
    Search
  6. as yet, no concrete controversy regarding the application of the specific zoning provisions. See Socialist Labor Party v. Gilligan
    Search
  7. U. S. 583 , 406 U. S. 588 (1972). See also Goldwater v. Carter
    Search
  8. property effects a taking if the ordinance does not substantially advance legitimate state interests, see Nectow v. Cambridge
    Search
  9. U. S. 188 (1928), or denies an owner economically viable use of his land, see Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New
    Search
  10. Although no precise rule determines Page 447 U. S. 261 when property has been taken, see Kaiser Aetna v. United
    Search
  11. the question necessarily requires a weighing of private and public interests. The seminal decision in Euclid v. Ambler
    Search
  12. Such governmental purposes long have been recognized as legitimate. See Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New
    Search
  13. Village of Belle Terre v. Page
    Search
  14. Euclid v. Ambler
    Search
  15. Although the ordinances limit development, they neither prevent the best use of appellants' land, see United States v. Causby
    Search
  16. U. S. 262 , and n. 7 (1946), nor extinguish a fundamental attribute of ownership, see Kaiser Aetna v. United
    Search
  17. guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. See Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New
    Search
  18. domain refers to a legal proceeding in which a government asserts its authority to condemn property. United States v. Clarke
    Search
  19. Dale v. City
    Search
  20. Martinez v. Socoma
    Search
  21. Court's application of state law does not raise a federal question appropriate for review by this Court. See Patterson v. Colorado
    Search
  22. so burdened the appellants' enjoyment of their property as to constitute a taking. See also City of Walnut Creek v. Leadership
    Search
  23. Danforth v. United
    Search
  24. States, 308 U. S. 271 , 308 U. S. 285 (1939). See Thomas W. Garland, Inc. v. City
    Search
  25. Reservation Eleven Associates v. District
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court Agins v. City
    Search
  27. See Socialist Labor Party v. Gilligan
    Search
  28. Nectow v. Cambridge
    Search
  29. Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New
    Search
  30. Kaiser Aetna v. United
    Search
  31. See Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New
    Search
  32. the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. See Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New
    Search
  33. Martinez v. Socoma
    Search
  34. Court. See Patterson v. Colorado
    Search
  35. City of Walnut Creek v. Leadership
    Search
  36. See Thomas W. Garland, Inc. v. City
    Search
  37. United States v. Clarke
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales