Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Reeves, Inc. Vs. Stake

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 19, 1980

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

70 entries 8 linked 62 unlinked
Show
  1. Heim Vs. Mccall US Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1915
  2. New State Ice Co. Vs. Liebmann US Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1932
  3. WeinsteIn Vs. Bradford US Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1975
  4. Toomer Vs. Witsell US Supreme Court · Jun 07, 1948
    Distinguished
  5. Helvering Vs. Gerhardt US Supreme Court · May 23, 1938
    Distinguished
  6. AtkIn Vs. Kansas US Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1903
  7. Foster-fountaIn Packing Co. Vs. Haydel US Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1928
    Distinguished
  8. National League of Cities Vs. Usery US Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1976
  9. U.S. 429 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Reeves, Inc. v. Stake
    Search
  10. U.S. 429 (1980) Reeves, Inc. v. Stake
    Search
  11. Hughes v. Alexandria
    Search
  12. Eakin v. South
    Search
  13. Clause. Id. at 27-30. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed. Reeves, Inc. v. Kelley
    Search
  14. as permitted by Hughes v. Alexandria
    Search
  15. Court granted the petition, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Hughes v. Oklahoma
    Search
  16. U. S. 322 (1979). Reeves, Inc. v. Kelley
    Search
  17. on Alexandria Page 447 U. S. 434 Scrap, the court abided by its previous holding. Reeves, Inc. v. Kelley
    Search
  18. was not the least disruptive means of achieving the State's articulated objective. Id. at 63. See generally Pike v. Bruce
    Search
  19. U. S. 175 , 239 U. S. 191 (1915), quoting Atkin v. Kansas
    Search
  20. United States v. Colgate
    Search
  21. freedoms from federal constraints, including the inherent limits of the Commerce Clause. See State e rel. Collins v. Senatobia
    Search
  22. Tribune Printing & Binding Co. v. Barnes
    Search
  23. Brief for Petitioner 25. Therefore, petitioner argues, the policy is per se invalid. See Philadelphia v. New
    Search
  24. App. 29. See, e.g., Baldwin v. Montana
    Search
  25. not fit the present facts. Cement is not a natural resource, like coal, timber, wild game, or minerals. Cf. Hughes v. Oklahoma
    Search
  26. Philadelphia v. New
    Search
  27. Pennsylvania v. West
    Search
  28. West v. Kansas
    Search
  29. protectionism and stifling of interstate commerce than the challenged system allows. See K.S.B. Technical Sales Corp. v. North
    Search
  30. Cf. Pike v. Bruce
    Search
  31. We now agree with the Court of Appeals that Hughes v. Oklahoma
    Search
  32. Jersey, 437 U. S. 617 , 437 U. S. 627 (1978), quoting Foster-Fountain Packing Co. v. Haydel
    Search
  33. Alexandria Scrap does not stand alone. In American Yearbook Co. v. Askew
    Search
  34. Note, 58 Iowa L.Rev. 576 (1973). City of Phoenix v. Superior
    Search
  35. Court, 109 Ariz. 533, 535, 514 P.2d 454, 456 (1973) (citing American Yearbook to reaffirm Schrey v. Allison
    Search
  36. Denver v. Bossie
    Search
  37. Holland v. Bleigh
    Search
  38. Collins v. Senatobia
    Search
  39. Allen v. Labsap
    Search
  40. Hersey v. Neilson
    Search
  41. N.D. 591, 75 N.W. 904 (1898). See also Dixon-Paul Printing Co. v. Board
    Search
  42. Luboil Heat & Power Corp. v. Pleydell
    Search
  43. Misc. 562, 564, 34 N.Y.S.2d 587, 591 (Sup. 1942). The only clear departure from this pattern, People ex rel. Treat v. Coler
    Search
  44. drew a strong dissent, and has been uniformly criticized in later decisions. See, e.g., State ex rel. Collins v. Senatobia
    Search
  45. supra. One other case merits comment. In Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Board
    Search
  46. legislation. Compare Bethlehem Steel Corp., supra, with K.S.B. Technical Sales Corp. v. North
    Search
  47. Clause scrutiny may well be more rigorous when a restraint on foreign commerce is alleged. See Japan Line, Ltd. v. County
    Search
  48. See American Yearbook Co. v. Askew
    Search
  49. may not be subject even to congressional regulation pursuant to the commerce power. National League of Cities v. Usery
    Search
  50. See Foster-Fountain Packing Co. v. Haydel
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial