Citation network
Adams Vs. Texas
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1980
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 38 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Adams v. TexasSearch
-
U.S. 38 (1980) Adams v. TexasSearch
-
Appeals rejected petitioner's contention that the prospective jurors had been excluded in violation of Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
the question whether Texas contravened the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments as construed and applied in Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
the petitioner argued that prospective jurors had been excluded in violation of this Court's decision in Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
Is the doctrine of Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
b) violate the doctrine of Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
facts of a given case, would clearly be unable to follow the law of Illinois in assessing punishment. In Boulden v. HolmanSearch
-
And in Lockett v. OhioSearch
-
know that affirmative answers to the questions will result in the automatic imposition of the death penalty, Hovila v. StateSearch
-
than inability to follow the law or abide by their oaths, the death sentence cannot be carried out. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
to each of the statutory penalty questions. This system was adopted in response to the Court's judgment in Branch v. TexasSearch
-
decided together with Furman v. GeorgiaSearch
-
whether to impose the death penalty or not. The Court upheld the revised Texas capital punishment scheme in Jurek v. TexasSearch
-
In Burns v. EstelleSearch
-
In Davis v. GeorgiaSearch
-
in that State. E.g., Woodkins v. StateSearch
-
Burns v. StateSearch
-
Brock v. StateSearch
-
Whitmore v. StateSearch
-
E.g., Moore v. StateSearch
-
Woodkins v. StateSearch
-
Shippy v. StateSearch
-
Freeman v. StateSearch
-
Hughes v. StateSearch
-
Bodde v. StateSearch
-
Garcia v. StateSearch
-
Burks v. StateSearch
-
Moore v. StateSearch
-
Chambers v. StateSearch
-
contrary to the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against imposition of cruel and unusual punishments. Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
is, under all circumstances, cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Furman v. GeorgiaSearch
-
In addition, I agree with the Court that the exclusion of veniremen in this case violated the doctrine of Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
be imposed. Cf. Page 448 U. S. 52 Beck v. AlabamaSearch
-
in the judgment of the Court. MR. JUSTIE REHNQUIST, dissenting. The Court today holds that, under Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
of the death penalty leave little doubt that, contrary to this Court's only slightly less recent decision in McGautha v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Adams v. TexasSearch
-
of Witherspoon v. IllinoisSearch
-
In Boulden v. HolmanSearch
-
Lockett v. OhioSearch
-
Hovila v. StateSearch
-
Branch v. TexasSearch
-
Furman v. GeorgiaSearch
-
State. E.g., Woodkins v. StateSearch
-
the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Furman v. GeorgiaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial