Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Williams Vs. Zbaraz

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 30, 1980

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 2 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. Harris Vs. Mcrae US Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1980
  2. Mclucas Vs. Dechamplain US Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1975
  3. U.S. 358 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Williams v. Zbaraz
    Search
  4. U.S. 358 (1980) Williams v. Zbaraz
    Search
  5. and thus may review the other issues preserved by these appeals. McLucas v. DeChamplain
    Search
  6. those medically necessary abortions for which federal reimbursement is unavailable under the Hyde Amendment. Harris v. McRae
    Search
  7. to those in the Hyde Amendment, do not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Harris v. McRae
    Search
  8. The plaintiffs appealed, and the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed. Zbaraz v. Quern
    Search
  9. The Court of Appeals again reversed. Zbaraz v. Quern
    Search
  10. F.2d 196. Reaching the same conclusion as had the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Preterm, Inc., v. Dukakis
    Search
  11. Page 448 U. S. 365 Zbaraz v. Quern
    Search
  12. unconstitutional divests this Court of jurisdiction over these appeals. We think not. As the Court in McLucas v. DeChamplain
    Search
  13. to declare the Hyde Amendment unconstitutional, that portion of its judgment must be vacated. See, e.g., United States v. Johnson
    Search
  14. Muskrat v. United
    Search
  15. Both arguments are foreclosed by our decision today in Harris v. McRae
    Search
  16. Together with No. 79-5, Miller, Acting Director, Department of Public Aid of Illinois, et al. v. Zbaraz
    Search
  17. et al., and No. 79-491, United States v. Zbaraz
    Search
  18. is taken from a court that lacked jurisdiction to declare a federal statute unconstitutional, see FHA v. The
    Search
  19. outcome of either issue now before the Court. The statutory issue is not affected, because we today conclude in Harris v. McRae
    Search
  20. to fund all abortions for which federal reimbursement is available under the Hyde Amendment, we conclude in Harris v. McRae
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court Williams v. Zbaraz
    Search
  22. the Hyde Amendment. Harris v. McRae
    Search
  23. the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Harris v. McRae
    Search
  24. Zbaraz v. Quern
    Search
  25. Preterm, Inc., v. Dukakis
    Search
  26. United States v. Johnson
    Search
  27. United States v. Zbaraz
    Search
  28. FHA v. The
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial