Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Hughes Vs. Rowe

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 10, 1980

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

58 entries 12 linked 46 unlinked
Show
  1. Haines Vs. Kerner US Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1972
  2. Bell Vs. Wolfish US Supreme Court · May 14, 1979
  3. Procunier Vs. Martinez US Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1974
  4. Christiansburg Garment Co. Vs. Eeoc US Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1978
  5. Cruz Vs. Beto US Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1972
  6. Estelle Vs. Gamble US Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1976
  7. Wolff Vs. Mcdonnell US Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1974
    Relied / Followed
  8. Conley Vs. Gibson US Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1957
  9. Meachum Vs. Fano US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1976
  10. Carey Vs. Piphus US Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1978
  11. Pell Vs. Procunier US Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1974
  12. Codd Vs. Velger US Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1977
  13. U.S. 5 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Hughes v. Rowe
    Search
  14. U.S. 5 (1980) Hughes v. Rowe
    Search
  15. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC
    Search
  16. U. S. 519 , 404 U. S. 520 (1972). See also Maclin v. Paulson
    Search
  17. French v. Page
    Search
  18. And, of course, the allegations of the complaint are generally taken as true for purposes of a motion to dismiss. Cruz v. Beto
    Search
  19. process if the postponement of procedural protections is not justified by apprehended emergency conditions. See Hayes v. Walker
    Search
  20. Although petitioner's pleadings are prolix and lacking in stylistic precision, this is not a case like Estelle v. Gamble
    Search
  21. can prove no set of facts in support of his claim Page 449 U. S. 13 entitling him to relief. Haines v. Kerner
    Search
  22. III The award of attorney's fees entered against petitioner must be vacated. In Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC
    Search
  23. apply with special force in actions initiated by uncounseled prisoners. Faithful adherence to the principles of Haines v. Kerner
    Search
  24. the standard to be applied in determining whether a prisoner has been afforded his minimum due process rights. Wolff v. McDonnell
    Search
  25. The Court reaffirmed the principles of Haines in Estelle v. Gamble
    Search
  26. As the Court unanimously held in Haines v. Kerner
    Search
  27. Id. at 449 U. S. 520 -521, quoting Conley v. Gibson
    Search
  28. hearing. The transfer of a resident from one cell to another does not trigger due process protections. Meachum v. Fano
    Search
  29. recognized by this Court, between the question of guilt and the question of appropriate punishment. Cf. Morrissey v. Brewer
    Search
  30. resulting from the initial denial of procedural safeguards, his constitutional claim is nonetheless actionable. Carey v. Piphus
    Search
  31. and concurring in the result. I agree with the result reached in Part II of the per curiam opinion. Under Wolff v. McDonnell
    Search
  32. deprivation, his damages would be limited to those flowing from postponement of a hearing for two days. Under Carey v. Piphus
    Search
  33. U. S. 520 , 441 U. S. 546 -547 (1979) (quoting Pell v. Procunier
    Search
  34. U. S. 817 , 417 U. S. 823 (1974)). See Jones v. North
    Search
  35. problems of running a prison, must accord the decisions of prison officials great deference. See, e.g., Jones v. North
    Search
  36. recognized that claims such as the present one must be based on allegations of 'bad faith' or 'mere pretext.' Hayes v. Walker
    Search
  37. F.2d 625, 633 (CA7 1977) (quoting La Batt v. Twomey
    Search
  38. was 'rationally related to the reasonable, indeed to the central, objectives of prison administration,' Jones v. North
    Search
  39. violation of petitioner's rights to hold a hearing when he was, as he admitted, drunk. This case is thus like Codd v. Velger
    Search
  40. has admitted and continues to admit his guilt. Nothing in the foregoing detracts from the rule of Haines v. Kerner
    Search
  41. to make it easier for pro se inmates to articulate their claims. Such forms should make the problem of Haines v. Kerner
    Search
  42. petitioner's suit was meritless in response to respondents' motion, which was based on Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC
    Search
  43. The Court's citation of Morrissey v. Brewer
    Search
  44. U. S. 471 (1972), and Carey v. Piphus
    Search
  45. U.S. Supreme Court Hughes v. Rowe
    Search
  46. Maclin v. Paulson
    Search
  47. See Hayes v. Walker
    Search
  48. In Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC
    Search
  49. of Haines v. Kerner
    Search
  50. Cf. Morrissey v. Brewer
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial