Citation network
Dennis Vs. Sparks
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 17, 1980
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 24 (1980) U.S. Supreme Court Dennis v. SparksSearch
-
U.S. 24 (1980) Dennis v. SparksSearch
-
coconspirators are sued, even though a charge of conspiracy and judicial corruption will be aired and decided. Gravel v. UnitedSearch
-
suit, whether or not the injunction had issued as the result of a corrupt conspiracy. Relying on Haldane v. ChagnonSearch
-
Sparks v. DuvalSearch
-
Court judgment was reversed insofar as it had dismissed claims against the defendants other than the judge. Sparks v. DuvalSearch
-
we granted the petition for certiorari. 445 U.S. 942. We now affirm. Based on the doctrine expressed in Bradley v. FisherSearch
-
actions enjoy absolute immunity from damages liability for acts performed in their judicial capacities. Pierson v. RaySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Supreme Court of Virginia v. ConsumersSearch
-
on the challenged conduct being an official judicial act within his statutory jurisdiction, broadly construed. Stump v. SparkmanSearch
-
are the equivalents of those that were recognized at common law, Owen v. CitySearch
-
U. S. 554 (1967), and the burden is on the official claiming immunity to demonstrate his entitlement. Cf. Butz v. EconomouSearch
-
U. S. 478 , 438 U. S. 506 (1978). Thus, in Owen v. CitySearch
-
In Gravel v. UnitedSearch
-
Clause, we have held that Members of Congress need not respond to questions about their legislative acts, Gravel v. UnitedSearch
-
has been patterned after immunity under the Speech or Debate Clause. Supreme Court of Virginia v. ConsumersSearch
-
are immune from 1983 damages actions, but they are subject to criminal prosecutions as are other citizens. O'Shea v. LittletonSearch
-
Cf. United States v. NixonSearch
-
be able to convince another tribunal that the judge acted not only mistakenly but with malice and corruption. Pierson v. RaySearch
-
Slavin v. CurrySearch
-
Perez v. BorchersSearch
-
Humble v. ForemanSearch
-
Hill v. McClellanSearch
-
Guedry v. FordSearch
-
Kurz v. MichiganSearch
-
Hazo v. GeltzSearch
-
Hansen v. AhlgrimmSearch
-
Sykes v. CaliforniaSearch
-
F.2d 197 (CA9 1974). See also Haldane v. ChagnonSearch
-
Briley v. CaliforniaSearch
-
The Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has for some time held the present views of the Fifth Circuit. Slotnick v. StaviskeySearch
-
Kermit Construction Corp. v. BancoSearch
-
Credito y Ahorro Ponceno, 547 F.2d 1 (1976). The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has recently agreed. White v. BloomSearch
-
United States v. ClassicSearch
-
Screws v. UnitedSearch
-
Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
See Imbler v. PachtmanSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Dennis v. SparksSearch
-
Gravel v. UnitedSearch
-
Haldane v. ChagnonSearch
-
Owen v. CitySearch
-
Cf. Butz v. EconomouSearch
-
Debate Clause. Supreme Court of Virginia v. ConsumersSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial