Citation network
California Vs. Minjares
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 916 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court California V. MinjaresSearch
-
U.S. 916 (1979) 443 U.S. 916 California V. PaulSearch
-
Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
S. 916 , 917 States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), 65 years ago. So many factors material to that decision, and to Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
See Fare v. MichaelSearch
-
Chambers v. MaroneySearch
-
Bivens v. SixSearch
-
Stone v. PowellSearch
-
U.S. 465, 499 (1976) (BURGER, C. J., concurring). This unique jurisprudential rule, as discussed in Stone v. PowellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
crimes which have traditionally been the principal responsibility of the States to enforce and administer. In Byars v. UnitedSearch
-
the search was justified, or that any violation of the Fourth Amendment in such a case was harmless error. In Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
People v. DeforeSearch
-
without application of the exclusionary rule was a nullity. Twelve years later, by a vote of 6-3 in the case of Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
U.S. 643 (1961), this Court overruled Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
In Stone v. PowellSearch
-
United States v. CalandraSearch
-
Elkins v. UnitedSearch
-
to determine whether or not the charge is true. As Mr. Jus Page 443 U.S. 916 , 925 tice Stone noted in McGuire v. UnitedSearch
-
Court. In United States v. PeltierSearch
-
Stone v. PowellSearch
-
See Stone v. PowellSearch
-
Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
Monell v. NewSearch
-
Bivens v. SixSearch
-
obtain redress for a wrongful violation of a constitutional right through the state mechanism. In his dissent in Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
Rogers v. MissouriSearch
-
Cady v. DombrowskiSearch
-
of the State. Thus, Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
charges, Page 443 U.S. 916 , 928 are substantially weaker today than they were either in 1949, when Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
of Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court California V. MinjaresSearch
-
California V. PaulSearch
-
Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
See Fare v. MichaelSearch
-
Bivens v. SixSearch
-
In Byars v. UnitedSearch
-
In Wolf v. ColoradoSearch
-
People v. DeforeSearch
-
of Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
In Stone v. PowellSearch
-
Elkins v. UnitedSearch
-
McGuire v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial