Citation network
Duren Vs. Missouri
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 09, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 357 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Duren v. MissouriSearch
-
U.S. 357 (1979) Duren v. MissouriSearch
-
of women on jury venires in the forum county did not violate the fair cross-section requirement set forth in Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
post, p. 439 U. S. 370 . MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court. In Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
See Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
Scharff v. StateSearch
-
Sess. (1975). See generally Daughtrey, Cross Sectionalism in Jury Selection Procedures After Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
accepted 6-year-old census data as adequate proof of the percentage of eligible jurors who are black. Alexander v. LouisianaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
petitioner and the United States, as amicus curiae, cite Castaneda v. PartidaSearch
-
Alexander v. LouisianaSearch
-
and Whitus v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Mt. Healthy City Bd. of Ed. v. DoyleSearch
-
Tr. of Oral Arg. 28. MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST, dissenting. The Court steadfastly maintained in Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
declaring that cases based on the Equal Protection Clause, such as Alexander v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 199 , 430 U. S. 210 -211 (1977) (plurality opinion), quoting Craig v. BorenSearch
-
ultimately lead. In Taylor, the Court relied upon cases dealing with outright exclusion of racial groups, Smith v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 128 (1940), and of women, Ballard v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. at 419 U. S. 533 . In Taylor, as in Hoyt v. FloridaSearch
-
is surely not a happy one. Will the Court's above-quoted dicta soon meet the same fate that the decision in Hoyt v. FloridaSearch
-
Strauder v. WestSearch
-
Tr. of Oral Arg. 15. This Court resorted to similiar mystical incantations in Peters v. KiffSearch
-
to the systematic exclusion of any race from jury service. Id. at 407 U. S. 503 . Similarly, in Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
those unconstitutionally excluded from jury service. Nor is it a necessary means to achieve that end, for, in Carter v. JurySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Duren v. MissouriSearch
-
Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
of the Court. In Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
Jury Selection Procedures After Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
Smith v. TexasSearch
-
Ballard v. UnitedSearch
-
Carter v. JurySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial