Citation network
Scott Vs. Illinois
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 05, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 367 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
U.S. 367 (1979) Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
by the Illinois Supreme Court, over the petitioner's contention that a line of cases culminating in Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
which imprisonment upon conviction is authorized but not imposed. Pp. 440 U. S. 369 -374. (a) Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
a conflict among state and lower federal courts regarding the proper application of our decision in Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
The petitioner argues that a line of this Court's cases culminating in Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
the question left open in Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
employ a lawyer to assist in his defense. W. Beaney, The Right to Counsel in American Courts 27-30 (1955). In Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
Id. at 287 U. S. 73 . Betts v. BradySearch
-
whether failure to appoint counsel was a denial of fundamental fairness. Betts was, in turn, overruled in Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
U.S. at 372 U. S. 339 . Several Terms later, the Court held, in Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
Id. at 391 U. S. 159 (footnote omitted). In Baldwin v. NewSearch
-
gave less in the way of right to counsel to accused felons than to those accused of misdemeanors. See Powell v. AlabamaSearch
-
Potts v. EstelleSearch
-
Winnie v. HarrisSearch
-
Wis.2d 547, 249 N.W.2d 791 (1977), with Sweeten v. SneddonSearch
-
Rollins v. StateSearch
-
Brief for Respondent in Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
case in which imprisonment was an authorized penalty for the underlying offense. Brief for Petitioner in Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
Brief for Legal Aid Society of New York as Amicus Curiae in Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
been in Baldwin for purposes of the jury trial guarantee. See, e.g., Brief for Respondent in Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
that was finally adopted -- that of actual imprisonment. Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae in Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
Cases 1-18 (1976). MR. JUSTICE POWELL, concurring. For the reasons stated in my opinion in Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
Emphasis supplied.) Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
Fourteenth Amendment and held that the right includes the right of the indigent to have counsel provided. Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
principles developed in the relevant precedents are clear and sound. The Court simply chooses to ignore them. Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
Page 440 U. S. 378 requirement, making the Court's former case-by-case due process analysis, cf. Betts v. BradySearch
-
The State, relying on Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 145 (1968), and Baldwin v. NewSearch
-
Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
have been used consistently by this Court as the true measures of the seriousness of offenses. See, e.g., Baldwin v. NewSearch
-
Frank v. UnitedSearch
-
cannot be made dependent on the budgetary decisions of state governments. A unanimous Court made that clear in Mayer v. ChicagoSearch
-
See Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
Klopfer v. NorthSearch
-
Washington v. TexasSearch
-
conviction implies dishonesty, it may be a basis for impeaching petitioner's testimony in a court proceeding. People v. StufflebeanSearch
-
United States v. WhiteSearch
-
Note, Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
The Mandate of Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
In Powell v. AlabamaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial