Citation network
Quern Vs. Jordan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 05, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 332 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Quern v. JordanSearch
-
U.S. 332 (1979) Quern v. JordanSearch
-
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Syllabus in Edelman V. JordanSearch
-
Neither Monell v. NewSearch
-
or shows that Congress considered and firmly decided to abrogate the Eleventh Amendment immunity of the States. Hutto v. FinneySearch
-
U. S. 366 . MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the Court. This case is a sequel to Edelman v. JordanSearch
-
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in this case and that of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Fanty v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Jordan v. TrainorSearch
-
to satisfy the claims of plaintiff class members without the consent of the State by its appropriate officials. Jordan v. TrainorSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Kennecott Copper Corp. v. StateSearch
-
Ford Motor Co. v. DepartmentSearch
-
Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
respondent suggests that our decision in Edelman has been eviscerated by later decisions such as Monell v. NewSearch
-
York City Dept. of Social Services, 436 U. S. 658 (1978). Brief for Respondent 55 n. 37. See also Aldridge v. TurlingtonSearch
-
Skehan v. BoardSearch
-
and may not include a retroactive award which requires the payment of funds from the state treasury, Ford Motor Co. v. DepartmentSearch
-
subsequent to Edelman and to Monell have cast no doubt on our holding in Edelman. See Alabama v. PughSearch
-
Page 440 U. S. 339 Hutto v. FinneySearch
-
While the separate opinions in Hutto v. FinneySearch
-
of Edelman after our decision in Monell, any doubt on that score was largely dispelled by Alabama v. PughSearch
-
of Corrections is barred by the Eleventh Amendment, unless Alabama has consented to the filing of such a suit. Edelman v. JordanSearch
-
U.S. at 436 U. S. 690 n. 54, and with Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSearch
-
Rights Act of 1964 applicable to state and local governments. 427 U.S. at 427 U. S. 452 , quoting Edelman v. JordanSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN's opinion amply demonstrate this point. Post at 440 U. S. 359 -365. See also Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
In Tenney v. BrandhoveSearch
-
purpose to abrogate Eleventh Amendment immunity than our Brother BRENNAN is able to marshal. In Employees v. MissouriSearch
-
In Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSearch
-
H.R.Conf.Rep. No. 9899, pp. 17-18 (1972). Finally, in Hutto v. FinneySearch
-
Employees v. MissouriSearch
-
Court, is more properly viewed as ancillary to the prospective relief already ordered by the court. See Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
The history of this case is set forth in greater detail in Edelman v. JordanSearch
-
benefits in reimbursement of amounts granted under state welfare laws violated this Court's decision in Philpott v. EssexSearch
-
The District Court agreed, and while it denied retroactive relief against the State on the basis of Edelman v. JordanSearch
-
notice of the complaint, the original lower court judgment, this Court's decision or its effect on them. See Eisen v. CarlisleSearch
-
In reaching its decision, the Seventh Circuit relied in part on our summary affirmance of Grubb v. SterrettSearch
-
the list of summary affirmances overruled in Edelman was not necessarily intended to be exhaustive. See Jordan v. TrainorSearch
-
had been held in Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
on the Eleventh Amendment immunity, without adverting in terms to the treatment of the legislative history in Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
U.S. at 437 U. S. 708 -709, n. 6. In fact, Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
In Hutto v. FinneySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Quern v. JordanSearch
-
of the States. Hutto v. FinneySearch
-
Fanty v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Kennecott Copper Corp. v. StateSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial