Citation network
Orr Vs. Orr
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 05, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 268 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Orr v. OrrSearch
-
U.S. 268 (1979) Orr v. OrrSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
here. We have on several occasions considered this inherent problem of challenges to underinclusive statutes, Stanton v. StantonSearch
-
Linda R. S. v. RichardSearch
-
D., 410 U. S. 614 , 410 U. S. 616 (1973), quoting Baker v. CarrSearch
-
Indeed, on indistinguishable facts, this Court has stated that a party's standing will be sustained. In Linda R. S. v. RichardSearch
-
U. S. 123 , 234 U. S. 134 (1914). Accord, Harlin v. MissouriSearch
-
and adequate state ground might exist and we would be without power to hear the constitutional argument. See Herb v. PitcairnSearch
-
federal question, but to remand to the state courts for clarification as to the ground of the decision. See California v. KrivdaSearch
-
U. S. 95 , 303 U. S. 98 (1938). Accord, United Air Lines, Inc. v. MahinSearch
-
Poafpybitty v. SkellySearch
-
Steele v. LouisvilleSearch
-
International Steel & Iron Co. v. NationalSearch
-
Red Cross Line v. AtlanticSearch
-
Rogers v. HennepinSearch
-
Reed v. PageSearch
-
the classification expressly discriminates against men, rather than women, does not protect it from scrutiny. Craig v. BorenSearch
-
role, and as seeking for their objective the reinforcement of that model among the State's citizens. Cf. Stern v. SternSearch
-
id. at 421 U. S. 14 -15. See also Craig v. BorenSearch
-
in that sphere, Schlesinger v. BallardSearch
-
U. S. 498 , 419 U. S. 508 (1975). Compare Califano v. WebsterSearch
-
supra at 430 U. S. 318 , and Kahn v. ShevinSearch
-
U. S. 351 , 416 U. S. 353 (1974), with Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSearch
-
Alabama's statutory scheme, Craig v. BorenSearch
-
hearings at which the parties' relative financial circumstances are considered already occur. See Russell v. RussellSearch
-
Ortman v. OrtmanSearch
-
of women and their need for special protection. Cf. United Jewish Organizations v. CareySearch
-
free to decide any questions of substantive state law not yet passed upon in this litigation. Indiana ex rel. Anderson v. BrandSearch
-
C. Wright, Federal Courts, at 544. See South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Orr v. OrrSearch
-
Anderson v. BrandSearch
-
In Linda R. S. v. RichardSearch
-
Accord, Harlin v. MissouriSearch
-
See Herb v. PitcairnSearch
-
See California v. KrivdaSearch
-
Accord, United Air Lines, Inc. v. MahinSearch
-
Cf. Stern v. SternSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial