Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Parham Vs. Hughes

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 24, 1979

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

56 entries 14 linked 42 unlinked
Show
  1. Vance Vs. Bradley US Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1979
  2. Frontiero Vs. Richardson US Supreme Court · May 14, 1973
  3. Massachusetts Bd. of Retirement Vs. Murgia US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1976
  4. Dandridge Vs. Williams US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1970
  5. MclaughlIn Vs. Florida US Supreme Court · Dec 07, 1964
  6. Gomez Vs. Perez US Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1973
  7. Reed Vs. Reed US Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1971
  8. Craig Vs. Boren US Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1976
  9. Trimble Vs. Gordon US Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1977
  10. Labine Vs. Vincent US Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1971
  11. Lalli Vs. Lalli US Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1978
  12. Mathews Vs. Lucas US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1976
    Relied / Followed
  13. Orr Vs. Orr US Supreme Court · Mar 05, 1979
  14. Caban Vs. Mohammed US Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1979
  15. U.S. 347 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Parham v. Hughes
    Search
  16. U.S. 347 (1979) Parham v. Hughes
    Search
  17. by punishing the illegitimate child who is in no way responsible for his situation and is unable to change it, Weber v. Aetna
    Search
  18. rather the reality that, in Georgia, only a father can, by unilateral action, legitimate an illegitimate child. Reed v. Reed
    Search
  19. s father. Pp. 441 U. S. 357 -358. 2. Nor does the Georgia statute violate the Due Process Clause, Stanley v. Illinois
    Search
  20. laws are generally entitled to a presumption of validity against attack under the Equal Protection Clause. Lockport v. Citizens
    Search
  21. are valid unless they bear no rational relationship to a permissible state objective. New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer
    Search
  22. Brown v. Board
    Search
  23. a State has enacted legislation creating classes based upon certain other immutable human attributes. See, e.g., Oyama v. California
    Search
  24. Graham v. Richardson
    Search
  25. between illegitimate children and legitimate children -- violate the Equal Protection Clause. E.g., Trimble v. Gordon
    Search
  26. Weber v. Aetna
    Search
  27. based upon sex are invalid under the Equal Protection Clause, e.g., Page 441 U. S. 354 Reed v. Reed
    Search
  28. differences between men and women or which demean the ability or social status of the affected class. Thus, in Reed v. Reed
    Search
  29. U.S. at 404 U. S. 77 . Similarly, in Frontiero v. Richardson
    Search
  30. U.S. at 421 U. S. 14 -15. See also Orr v. Orr
    Search
  31. is realistically based upon the differences in their situations, this Court has upheld its validity. In Schlesinger v. Ballard
    Search
  32. child, whose identity will rarely be in doubt, the identity of the father will frequently be unknown. Lalli v. Lalli
    Search
  33. interest in the maintenance of an accurate and efficient system for the disposition of property at death. E.g., Lalli v. Lalli
    Search
  34. supra at 439 U. S. 265 . See also Gomez v. Perez
    Search
  35. for wrongful Page 441 U. S. 358 death, and we cannot say that this solution is an irrational one. Cf. Lalli v. Lalli
    Search
  36. proving paternity, it is constitutionally irrelevant that the appellant may be able to prove paternity in another manner. v. The
    Search
  37. only decision of this Court cited by the appellant that is even remotely related to his due process claim is Stanley v. Illinois
    Search
  38. to further a sufficiently adequate state interest, however, the Court has upheld the validity of the statutes. Lalli v. Lalli
    Search
  39. U.S. at 439 U. S. 268 -269. (Citations omitted.) In Glona v. American
    Search
  40. U. S. 762 , 430 U. S. 771 . Cf. Lalli v. Lalli
    Search
  41. The ability of a father to make his child legitimate under Georgia law distinguishes this case from Caban v. Mohammed
    Search
  42. statute, and at the same time is a rational method for the State to deal with the problem of proving paternity. Lalli v. Lalli
    Search
  43. U. S. 190 , 429 U. S. 197 (1976). See Orr v. Orr
    Search
  44. U.S. Supreme Court Parham v. Hughes
    Search
  45. the Due Process Clause, Stanley v. Illinois
    Search
  46. the Equal Protection Clause. Lockport v. Citizens
    Search
  47. New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer
    Search
  48. Oyama v. California
    Search
  49. the Equal Protection Clause. E.g., Trimble v. Gordon
    Search
  50. In Schlesinger v. Ballard
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial