Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Naftalin

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 21, 1979

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 4 linked 25 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Gilliland US Supreme Court · Feb 03, 1941
    Relied / Followed
  2. United States Vs. Culbert US Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1978
  3. United States Vs. Campos-serrano US Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1971
  4. Costanzo Vs. Tillinghast US Supreme Court · Dec 05, 1932
  5. U.S. 768 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Naftalin
    Search
  6. U.S. 768 (1979) United States v. Naftalin
    Search
  7. SEC v. Capital
    Search
  8. SEC v. National
    Search
  9. is meant to cover additional kinds of illegalities -- not to narrow the reach of the prior sections. See United States v. Birrell
    Search
  10. of the statute in protecting investors from fraudulent practices in the sale of securities, see Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder
    Search
  11. Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder
    Search
  12. Gains Bureau, 375 U. S. 180 , 375 U. S. 186 -187 (1963) (emphasis added). See Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder
    Search
  13. United States v. Brown
    Search
  14. SEC v. National
    Search
  15. Securities, Inc., 393 U.S. at 393 U. S. 468 . See Edwards v. United
    Search
  16. U. S. 371 , 435 U. S. 379 (1978), quoting Rewis v. United
    Search
  17. U. S. 293 , 404 U. S. 297 (1971), quoting Keppel v. Tiffin
    Search
  18. Congress, see H.R.Rep. No. 85, 73d Cong., 1st Sess., 6 (1933), and this Court, see Superintendent of Insurance v. Bankers
    Search
  19. This case involves a criminal prosecution. The decision in Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor
    Search
  20. implied causes of action under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5, is therefore inapplicable. See SEC v. National
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Naftalin
    Search
  22. See United States v. Birrell
    Search
  23. See Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder
    Search
  24. See Edwards v. United
    Search
  25. Rewis v. United
    Search
  26. Keppel v. Tiffin
    Search
  27. Superintendent of Insurance v. Bankers
    Search
  28. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor
    Search
  29. See SEC v. National
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial