Citation network
ibew Vs. Foust
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 29, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 42 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court IBEW v. FoustSearch
-
U.S. 42 (1979) International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. FoustSearch
-
a Page 442 U. S. 46 union has acted wantonly or in reckless disregard of an employee's rights. See Harrison v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. 892 (1978). II This Court first recognized the statutory duty of fair representation in Steele v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Humphrey v. MooreSearch
-
Hines v. AnchorSearch
-
members during the negotiation, administration, and enforcement of collective bargaining agreements. See, e.g., Conley v. GibsonSearch
-
Steele v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Textile Workers v. PageSearch
-
Clearfield Trust Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Gertz v. RobertSearch
-
Because actual damages caused by a union's failure to pursue grievances may be de minimis, see Harrison v. UnitedSearch
-
St. Clair v. LocalSearch
-
injured employee whole. Id. at 323 U. S. 206 -207. This compensation principle was again invoked in Vaca v. SipesSearch
-
Because juries are accorded broad discretion both as to the imposition and amount of punitive damages, see Gertz v. RobertSearch
-
pp. 13-14, the impact of these windfall recoveries is unpredictable, and potentially substantial. Cf. Hall v. ColeSearch
-
union, is simply too great a price for whatever deterrent effect punitive damages may have. Cf. Automobile Workers v. RussellSearch
-
Court has refused to permit punitive sanctions in certain unfair labor practice cases, see, e.g., Republic Steel Corp. v. NLRBSearch
-
Carpenters v. NLRBSearch
-
Teamsters v. MortonSearch
-
Virginian R. Co. v. RailwaySearch
-
Republic Steel Corp. v. NLRBSearch
-
Deboles v. TransSearch
-
World Airlines, Inc., 552 F.2d 1005, 1019 (CA3), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 837 (1977). See also Williams v. PacificSearch
-
See Butler v. TeamstersSearch
-
Emmanuel v. OmahaSearch
-
Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. LindeSearch
-
Berenyi v. ImmigrationSearch
-
Railway Labor Act, affords unions exclusive power to represent all employees of a bargaining unit. See, e.g., Syres v. OilSearch
-
the Court has applied Vaca's apportionment principle to cases arising under the Railway Labor Act. In Czosek v. O'MaraSearch
-
toward unions, management, or minority views can thus find expression in punitive awards. See Automobile Workers v. RussellSearch
-
the Court wrote in Vaca v. SipesSearch
-
Depending on the circumstances of the particular breach, the Court wrote in Steele v. LouisvilleSearch
-
U. S. 52 . The Court cites two major cases to support this theory. Neither is apposite. In Republic Steel Corp. v. NLRBSearch
-
and the authority to impose punitive sanctions in their efforts to devise a federal law of remedies. In Teamsters v. MortonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court IBEW v. FoustSearch
-
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. FoustSearch
-
See Harrison v. UnitedSearch
-
Clearfield Trust Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Harrison v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Hall v. ColeSearch
-
Cf. Automobile Workers v. RussellSearch
-
Republic Steel Corp. v. NLRBSearch
-
Williams v. PacificSearch
-
Syres v. OilSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial