Citation network
United States Vs. Addonizio
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 04, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 178 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. AddonizioSearch
-
U.S. 178 (1979) United States v. AddonizioSearch
-
taken by the sentencing judge was unconstitutional or was based on misinformation of constitutional magnitude. Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 417 U. S. 333 , and United States v. TuckerSearch
-
and moved for resentencing. Following the Third Circuit's decision in United States v. SalernoSearch
-
by providing an equally broad remedy in the more convenient jurisdiction of the sentencing court. United States v. HaymanSearch
-
later years, the availability of the writ was expanded to encompass claims of constitutional error as well. See Waley v. JohnstonSearch
-
Brown v. AllenSearch
-
a lack of jurisdiction or constitutional error, the scope of collateral attack has remained far more limited. Stone v. PowellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Hill v. UnitedSearch
-
Addonizio's claim from those in prior cases, upon which he relies, in which collateral attacks were permitted. Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
would be performed, but it did not affect the lawfulness of the judgment itself -- then or now. Nor is United States v. TuckerSearch
-
of counsel is itself violated when uncounseled convictions serve as the basis for enhanced punishment. Burgett v. TexasSearch
-
Bonanno v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. WhelanSearch
-
See Geraghty v. UnitedSearch
-
See Rodriguez v. UnitedSearch
-
See Adams v. UnitedSearch
-
evidentiary hearings are often inconclusive, and retrials may be impossible if the attack is successful. See Stone v. PowellSearch
-
the defendant will actually be paroled at that time is the decision of the Parole Commission. See United States v. GraysonSearch
-
related only to the second of a pair of consecutive sentences which itself was not being served at the time. Affronti v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. AddonizioSearch
-
Davis v. UnitedSearch
-
and United States v. TuckerSearch
-
See Waley v. JohnstonSearch
-
Burgett v. TexasSearch
-
See Stone v. PowellSearch
-
of the Parole Commission. See United States v. GraysonSearch
-
Affronti v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MurraySearch
-
United States v. SalernoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial