Citation network
United States Vs. Batchelder
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 04, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 114 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. BatchelderSearch
-
U.S. 114 (1979) United States v. BatchelderSearch
-
United States v. BordenSearch
-
h) and 1202(a), both as to the conduct they proscribe and the individuals they reach. See United States v. BassSearch
-
which had been in existence for many years. Scarborough v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BassSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Scarborough v. UnitedSearch
-
they presumably would not have indicated that the purpose of Title VII was to complement Title IV. See Scarborough v. UnitedSearch
-
the well established doctrine that ambiguities in criminal statutes must be resolved in favor of lenity. E.g., Rewis v. UnitedSearch
-
Dunn v. UnitedSearch
-
Although this principle of construction applies to sentencing as well as substantive provisions, see Simpson v. UnitedSearch
-
is no justification for taking liberties with unequivocal statutory Page 442 U. S. 122 language. See Barrett v. UnitedSearch
-
Radzanower v. ToucheSearch
-
from the language of the statute. Swain v. PressleySearch
-
Crowell v. BensonSearch
-
Shapiro v. UnitedSearch
-
Lanzetta v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 612 , 347 U. S. 617 (1954). See Connally v. GeneralSearch
-
Papachristou v. JacksonvilleSearch
-
if they do not state with sufficient clarity the consequences of violating a given criminal statute. See United States v. EvansSearch
-
United States v. BrownSearch
-
Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
U. S. 124 under either so long as it does not discriminate against any class of defendants. See United States v. BeaconSearch
-
Rosenberg v. UnitedSearch
-
SEC v. NationalSearch
-
allowing prosecutorial choice. 581 F.2d at 632. Nevertheless, relying on the dissenting opinion in Berra v. UnitedSearch
-
fact, standing alone, does not give rise to a violation of the Equal Protection or Due Process Clause. Cf. Rosenberg v. UnitedSearch
-
Branch the Legislature's responsibility to fix criminal penalties. Page 442 U. S. 126 See United States v. HudsonSearch
-
United States v. EvansSearch
-
the permissible punishment alternatives available under each Title, Congress has fulfilled its duty. See United States v. EvansSearch
-
h) and 1202(a) may vary slightly. See Barrett v. UnitedSearch
-
Scarborough v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. BatchelderSearch
-
Title IV. See Scarborough v. UnitedSearch
-
E.g., Rewis v. UnitedSearch
-
Simpson v. UnitedSearch
-
See Barrett v. UnitedSearch
-
See Connally v. GeneralSearch
-
See United States v. EvansSearch
-
Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
See United States v. BeaconSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial