Citation network
Reiter Vs. Sonotone Corp.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 11, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Reiter v. SonotoneSearch
-
Corp. - 442 U.S. 330 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Reiter v. SonotoneSearch
-
Corp., 442 U.S. 330 (1979) Reiter v. SonotoneSearch
-
Pipe Works Page 442 U. S. 331 v. AtlantaSearch
-
an increase in the price paid for the article purchased. The District Court relied on Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. AtlantaSearch
-
S. 390 , 203 U. S. 396 (1906), and the legislative history of the Clayton Act set forth in Brunswick Corp. v. PuebloSearch
-
to those engaged in commercial ventures. It relied on the legislative history and this Court's statement in Hawaii v. StandardSearch
-
contains little in the way of restrictive language. In Pfizer Inc. v. GovernmentSearch
-
forbidden practices Page 442 U. S. 338 by whomever they may be perpetrated.' Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. AmericanSearch
-
Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. InternationalSearch
-
In construing a statute, we are obliged to give effect, if possible, to every word Congress used. United States v. MenascheSearch
-
here it does not. See FCC v. PacificaSearch
-
also retains restrictive significance. It would, for example, exclude personal injuries suffered. E.g., Hamman v. UnitedSearch
-
Indeed, this Court indicated as much in Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. AtlantaSearch
-
is implicit in our decision in Goldfarb v. VirginiaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
E.g., Pfizer Inc. v. GovernmentSearch
-
Brunswick Corp. v. PuebloSearch
-
Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Mandeville Island Farms v. AmericanSearch
-
Crystal Sugar Co., 334 U. S. 219 , 334 U. S. 236 (1948). Hawaii v. StandardSearch
-
in Hawaii v. StandardSearch
-
treble damages are recoverable by a state under the Clayton Act. Hawaii v. StandardSearch
-
In Brunswick Corp. v. PuebloSearch
-
Differing views on this issue have been expressed by various courts. See, e.g., Reiter v. SonotoneSearch
-
Bravman v. BassettSearch
-
Cleary v. ChalkSearch
-
Theophil v. Sheller-GlobeSearch
-
was barred by the direct purchaser rule of Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSearch
-
Hawaii v. StandardSearch
-
Weinberg v. FederatedSearch
-
H.R.Rep. No. 94-499, pp. 6, 9 (1975). See also Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Reiter v. SonotoneSearch
-
Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works Page 442 U. S. 331 v. AtlantaSearch
-
Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. AtlantaSearch
-
Hawaii v. StandardSearch
-
In Pfizer Inc. v. GovernmentSearch
-
Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. AmericanSearch
-
Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. InternationalSearch
-
United States v. MenascheSearch
-
See FCC v. PacificaSearch
-
E.g., Hamman v. UnitedSearch
-
Goldfarb v. VirginiaSearch
-
the Clayton Act. Hawaii v. StandardSearch
-
of Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSearch
-
Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial