Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Rutherford

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 18, 1979

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 5 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Key US Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1970
  2. Bayside Enterprises, Inc. Vs. Nlrb US Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1977
  3. Udall Vs. Tallman US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1965
  4. Zemel Vs. Rusk US Supreme Court · May 03, 1965
  5. Apex Hosiery Co. Vs. Leader US Supreme Court · May 27, 1940
  6. U.S. 544 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Rutherford
    Search
  7. U.S. 544 (1979) United States v. Rutherford
    Search
  8. Fed.Reg. 39775-39787 (1977). In so ruling, the Commissioner applied the statutory criteria delineated in Weinberger v. Hynson
    Search
  9. United States v. Lexington
    Search
  10. Mill & Elevator Co., 232 U. S. 399 , 232 U. S. 409 (1914). See Andrus v. Sierra
    Search
  11. or consequences obviously at variance with the policy of the enactment as a whole. Helvering v. Hammell
    Search
  12. U. S. 504 , 311 U. S. 510 -511 (1941). See Tva V. Hill
    Search
  13. United States v. American
    Search
  14. a statute by those charged with its administration is entitled to substantial deference. Board of Governors of FRS v. First
    Search
  15. and Congress has not acted to correct any misperception of its statutory objectives. See Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC
    Search
  16. revision, empowered to rewrite legislation in accord with their own conceptions of prudent public policy. See Anderson v. Wilson
    Search
  17. fairly be attributed to congressional design will an exception to statutory language be judicially implied. See TVA v. Hill
    Search
  18. evidence, that the drug in fact produces the results claimed for it under prescribed conditions. See Weinberger v. Hynson
    Search
  19. p)(1). However, based on the structure and purpose of the statutory scheme, this Court, in Weinberger v. Hynson
    Search
  20. infer approval of a judicial or administrative interpretation from congressional silence alone. See, e.g., Helvering v. Hallock
    Search
  21. Toucey v. New
    Search
  22. the statute in other respects, then presumably the legislative intent has been correctly discerned. Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader
    Search
  23. U. S. 469 , 310 U. S. 487 -489 (1940). See United States v. Bergh
    Search
  24. issue, we remand the case for further consideration of respondents' claims. See Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. National
    Search
  25. Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Rutherford
    Search
  27. Weinberger v. Hynson
    Search
  28. See Andrus v. Sierra
    Search
  29. Helvering v. Hammell
    Search
  30. See TVA v. Hill
    Search
  31. Board of Governors of FRS v. First
    Search
  32. See Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC
    Search
  33. See Anderson v. Wilson
    Search
  34. See Weinberger v. Hynson
    Search
  35. Helvering v. Hallock
    Search
  36. See United States v. Bergh
    Search
  37. See Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. National
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales