Citation network
Califano Vs. Westcott
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 76 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Califano v. WestcottSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 76 (1979) Califano v. WestcottSearch
-
Taylor v. LouisianaSearch
-
with federal standards, and is financed by the Federal Government and the States on a matching funds basis. King v. SmithSearch
-
to families whose dependent children were needy because of the death, absence, or incapacity of a parent. Batterton v. FrancisSearch
-
assistance to families whose dependent children were deprived of support because of a parent's unemployment. Batterton v. FrancisSearch
-
in benefits being granted or denied to family units on the basis of the sex of the qualifying parent. See Frontiero v. RichardsonSearch
-
Califano v. JablonSearch
-
not subject to the guarantee of equal protection. See Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
constitutional scrutiny because it is substantially related to achievement of an important governmental objective. Orr v. OrrSearch
-
Sess., 2 (1961), there is no evidence that the gender distinction was designed to address this problem. See Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSearch
-
toward the goal of eliminating the incentive to desert, quoting Califano v. JobstSearch
-
the consequence is to exclude one group of families altogether from badly needed subsistence benefits. Cf. Williamson v. LeeSearch
-
Welsh v. UnitedSearch
-
statutes, this Court has suggested that extension, rather than nullification, is the proper course. See, e.g., Jimenez v. WeinbergerSearch
-
judgments ordering that welfare benefits be paid to members of an unconstitutionally excluded class. E.g., Califano v. GoldfarbSearch
-
Califano v. SilbowitzSearch
-
Jablon v. CalifanoSearch
-
Richardson v. GriffinSearch
-
lines. App. to Juris.Statement in No. 78-689, p. 15a. Since no party has presented the issue of extension v. nullificationSearch
-
exists. B The narrower question presented by the Commissioner's appeal concerns not the merits of extension versus nullificationSearch
-
Together with No. 78-689, Pratt, Commissioner, Department of Public Welfare of Massachusetts v. WestcottSearch
-
financial requirements are determined by the participating States, and vary widely from one State to another. Rosado v. WymanSearch
-
that will render a family eligible for AFDC-UF benefits. Batterton v. FrancisSearch
-
and distribution of welfare funds are peculiarly within the province of the Legislative Branch. See Califano v. JobstSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Califano v. WestcottSearch
-
King v. SmithSearch
-
See Frontiero v. RichardsonSearch
-
See Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
See Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSearch
-
Cf. Williamson v. LeeSearch
-
E.g., Califano v. GoldfarbSearch
-
Pratt, Commissioner, Department of Public Welfare of Massachusetts v. WestcottSearch
-
of the Legislative Branch. See Califano v. JobstSearch
-
Stanton v. StantonSearch
-
Rosado v. WymanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial