Citation network
Barry Vs. Barchi
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 55 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Barry v. BarchiSearch
-
U.S. 55 (1979) Barry v. BarchiSearch
-
Barchi v. SarafanSearch
-
a horse has been drugged and that a trainer has been at least negligent in connection with the drugging. Cf. Gerstein v. PughSearch
-
Barchi v. SarafanSearch
-
Under New York law, a license may not be revoked or suspended at the discretion of the racing authorities. Cf. Bishop v. WoodSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
Gerard v. BarrySearch
-
of which he cannot be deprived without procedural due process. What was said of automobile drivers' licenses in Bell v. BursonSearch
-
See Dixon v. LoveSearch
-
New Motor Vehicle Bd. of Cal. v. OrrinSearch
-
W. Fox Co., 439 U. S. 96 (1978). Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
U. S. 564 (1972), stated, in identifying protected interests, that Bell v. BursonSearch
-
from challenging the conditions attached to it, including the procedures for suspension and revocation. See Arnett v. KennedySearch
-
plurality opinion). The Court properly rejects this contention -- indeed, does not even mention it. Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
at stake is protected by the Due Process Clause, a court has occasion only to inquire what process is due. See Dixon v. LoveSearch
-
Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
supra at 408 U. S. 570 n. 7, quoting Boddie v. ConnecticutSearch
-
Smith v. OrganizationSearch
-
that full hearing must be available promptly after the temporary deprivation occurs. See North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-ChemSearch
-
Joint Anti-Fascist Comm. v. McGrathSearch
-
requirement of due process is the opportunity to be heard 'at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.' Armstrong v. ManzoSearch
-
U. S. 545 , 380 U. S. 552 (1965). See Grannis v. OrdeanSearch
-
since agreement with that challenge would result in greater relief than was awarded him by the District Court. See FEA v. AlgonquinSearch
-
on the question whether an irrebuttable presumption of trainer responsibility is constitutional. Compare Brennan v. IllinoisSearch
-
Racing Board, 42 Ill.2d 352, 247 N.E.2d 881 (1969) (irrebuttable presumption unconstitutional), with Hubel v. WestSearch
-
Racing Comm'n, 513 F.2d 240 (CA4 1975) (irrebuttable presumption constitutional). See generally Note, Brennan v. IllinoisSearch
-
ibid., is necessary here. Cf. Perry v. SindermannSearch
-
Cf. Hubel v. WestSearch
-
in this context are sufficient to justify postponing a trainer's hearing until after his suspension. See Mackey v. MontrymSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Barry v. BarchiSearch
-
Cf. Gerstein v. PughSearch
-
Cf. Bishop v. WoodSearch
-
New Motor Vehicle Bd. of Cal. v. OrrinSearch
-
See Arnett v. KennedySearch
-
Smith v. OrganizationSearch
-
See North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-ChemSearch
-
See Grannis v. OrdeanSearch
-
the District Court. See FEA v. AlgonquinSearch
-
Compare Brennan v. IllinoisSearch
-
Hubel v. WestSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial