Citation network
Michigan Vs. Defillippo
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 31 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Michigan v. DeFillippoSearch
-
U.S. 31 (1979) Michigan v. DeFillippoSearch
-
valid ordinance was valid, the search which followed was valid because it was incidental to that arrest. Torres v. PuertoSearch
-
Almeida-Sanchez v. UnitedSearch
-
Sibron v. NewSearch
-
and Berger v. NewSearch
-
holdings of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that such arrests are valid. See United States v. CardenSearch
-
United States v. KilgenSearch
-
Fourteenth Amendments, an arresting officer may, without a warrant, search a person validly arrested. United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
possesses weapons or evidence. The fact of a lawful arrest, standing alone, authorizes a search. United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
Whether an officer is authorized to make an arrest ordinarily depends, in the first instance, on state law. Ker v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
a warrant if there is probable cause to believe that the suspect has committed or is committing an offense. Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
proof and the procedural requirements necessary for a conviction are not prerequisites to a valid arrest. See Gerstein v. PughSearch
-
Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
the circumstances shown, that the suspect has committed, is committing, or is about to commit an offense. See Gerstein v. PughSearch
-
Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
Draper v. UnitedSearch
-
Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
upon themselves to determine which laws are and which are not constitutionally entitled to enforcement. In Pierson v. RaySearch
-
purported to authorize the searches in question without probable cause and without a valid warrant. See, e.g., Torres v. PuertoSearch
-
Berger v. NewSearch
-
the traditional warrant and probable cause requirements of the Fourth Amendment. For example, in Almeida-Sanchez v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 268 . We held a search so distant from the point of entry was unreasonable under the Constitution. In Berger v. NewSearch
-
the Detroit ordinance. For the dispute in this case is not between the arresting officers and respondent. Cf. Pierson v. RaySearch
-
was the product of legislative action, and that the police were merely executing the laws in good faith. See Torres v. PuertoSearch
-
York, 392 U. S. 40 , 392 U. S. 61 (1968), quoting in part from Cooper v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
York, 442 U. S. 200 , 442 U. S. 208 (1979), quoting from Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 1 , 392 U. S. 27 (1968), and carefully circumscribed. See Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
only if the police have reason to believe that they are dealing with an armed and dangerous individual. See Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Page 443 U. S. 45 Davis v. MississippiSearch
-
Coates v. CincinnatiSearch
-
scale search and seizure. Clearly, this is a sheer piece of legislative legerdemain not to be countenanced. See Davis v. MississippiSearch
-
The Court's reliance upon Pierson v. RaySearch
-
the questions put to him by the police, see ante at 443 U. S. 37 , but nonetheless, relying upon Pierson v. RaySearch
-
In addition to the Fourth Amendment, see Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
the basis of suspicion may find its source in the Fifth Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination, see Haynes v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Michigan v. DeFillippoSearch
-
Torres v. PuertoSearch
-
See United States v. CardenSearch
-
United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
Ker v. CaliforniaSearch
-
See Gerstein v. PughSearch
-
In Pierson v. RaySearch
-
the Constitution. In Berger v. NewSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial