Citation network
Mackey Vs. Montrym
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 25, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 1 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Mackey v. MontrymSearch
-
U.S. 1 (1979) Mackey v. MontrymSearch
-
The Massachusetts statute is not void on its face as violative of the Due Process Clause. Cf. Dixon v. LoveSearch
-
as the administrative and fiscal burdens, if any, that would result from the substitute procedures sought. Mathews v. EldridgeSearch
-
the three-judge District Court granted Montrym's motion. Relying principally on this Court's decision in Bell v. BursonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
enforcing the statute, and directed him to return the driver's licenses of the plaintiff class members. Montrym v. PanoraSearch
-
Court for a stay and modification of its judgment, which motions were denied. After release of our opinion in Dixon v. LoveSearch
-
the Page 443 U. S. 10 dissenting judge thought Love controlled. Montrym v. PanoraSearch
-
We noted probable jurisdiction following the submission of supplemental briefs by the parties. Sub nom. Panora v. MontrymSearch
-
before suspension of a license. 429 F.Supp. at 398-400. Later, the court further held that our decision in Dixon v. LoveSearch
-
Illinois scheme only after a driver had been suspended and had demonstrated his eligibility for such relief. See Dixon v. LoveSearch
-
interest is an important factor in assessing the impact of official action on the private interest involved. Fusari v. SteinbergSearch
-
U. S. 13 Because a primary function of legal process is to minimize the risk of erroneous decisions, Greenholtz v. NebraskaSearch
-
that all governmental decisionmaking comply with standards that assure perfect, error-free determinations. Greenholtz v. NebraskaSearch
-
facts justifying the official action are as a responsible governmental official warrants them to be. See, e.g., Barry v. BarchiSearch
-
of any evidentiary hearing necessary to resolve questions of credibility or conflicts in the evidence. Cf. Barry v. BarchiSearch
-
has in preserving the safety of its public highways, standing alone, fully distinguishes this case from Bell v. BursonSearch
-
North American Storage Co. v. ChicagoSearch
-
of hearings sought, and therefore impose a substantial fiscal and administrative burden on the Commonwealth. Dixon v. LoveSearch
-
Clause applies to a state's suspension or revocation of a driver's license is clear from our decisions in Dixon v. LoveSearch
-
U. S. 105 , 431 U. S. 112 (1977), and Bell v. BursonSearch
-
this penalty without first affording the driver an opportunity to be heard. A Our decisions in Bell v. BursonSearch
-
U. S. 535 , and Dixon v. LoveSearch
-
and a meaningful opportunity to be heard before the State acts finally to deprive a person of his property. Mullane v. CentralSearch
-
Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div. v. CraftSearch
-
U. S. 645 , 405 U. S. 656 . Cf. Memphis Light, Gas Water Div. v. CraftSearch
-
requirement of some kind of hearing before a final deprivation takes effect is all the more important. Thus, in Bell v. BursonSearch
-
nature of the case, the interests affected, and the prompt availability of adequate postdeprivation procedures. Boddie v. ConnecticutSearch
-
Page 443 U. S. 22 evidentiary hearing on a critical issue is not constitutionally sufficient. Compare Mathews v. EldridgeSearch
-
Bell v. BursonSearch
-
supra. The case of Dixon v. LoveSearch
-
no broad exception to the normal presumption in favor of a prior hearing. See Memphis Light, Gas Water Div. v. CraftSearch
-
charge against him. Thus, there was clearly a significant factual dispute in this case. That dispute, as in Bell v. BursonSearch
-
of liberty based upon ex parte probable cause determinations by the police are, of course, not unusual, Gerstein v. PughSearch
-
affidavits to determine whether arrest or search warrants should issue are likewise commonly made. E.g., Aguilar v. TexasSearch
-
subject to adjudicative factfinding, and one that plainly involves issues of credibility and veracity. Mathews v. EldridgeSearch
-
the suspension itself effects a final deprivation of property that no subsequent proceeding can restore. Cf. Mathews v. EldridgeSearch
-
which that interest will be frustrated by the delay necessitated by a prior hearing. E.g., North American Storage Co. v. ChicagoSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Mackey v. MontrymSearch
-
of the Due Process Clause. Cf. Dixon v. LoveSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial