Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Califano Vs. Boles

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 27, 1979

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 17 linked 18 unlinked
Show
  1. Califano Vs. Jobst US Supreme Court · Nov 08, 1977
  2. Weinberger Vs. Salfi US Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1975
  3. Richardson Vs. Perales US Supreme Court · May 03, 1971
  4. Gomez Vs. Perez US Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1973
  5. Jimenez Vs. Weinberger US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1974
  6. Trimble Vs. Gordon US Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1977
  7. Califano Vs. Yamasaki US Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1979
  8. Califano Vs. Webster US Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1977
  9. Califano Vs. Goldfarb US Supreme Court · Mar 02, 1977
  10. Norton Vs. Mathews US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1976
  11. Mathews Vs. Lucas US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1976
  12. Mathews Vs. Eldridge US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1976
  13. Weinberger Vs. Wiesenfeld US Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1975
  14. Richardson Vs. Wright US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1972
  15. Richardson Vs. Belcher US Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1971
  16. Flemming Vs. Nestor US Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1960
  17. Dandridge Vs. Williams US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1970
  18. U.S. 282 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Califano v. Boles
    Search
  19. U.S. 282 (1979) Califano v. Boles
    Search
  20. that benefit levels would probably be reduced, precluding a Page 443 U. S. 285 perfect fit in fact. Mathews v. Lucas
    Search
  21. trappings of the adversary process lest, again, benefit levels be threatened by the costs of administration. Mathews v. Eldridge
    Search
  22. By virtue of this Court's decision in Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld
    Search
  23. g)(1) of the SSA was unconstitutional. There were three steps in its logic. First, it read Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld
    Search
  24. grounds legislation that discriminated against illegitimates solely because of their status at birth. E.g., Weber v. Aetna
    Search
  25. analyzed the equal protection issue in this case. We accordingly reverse. As this Court noted in Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld
    Search
  26. U.S. at 429 U. S. 188 -189. Likewise, Weinberger v. Salfi
    Search
  27. g) is the product of discriminatory purposes. See Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. Feeney
    Search
  28. involving claims arising under federal-state cooperative welfare programs authorized by the SSA. See, e.g., Graham v. Richardson
    Search
  29. California Human Resources Dept. v. Java
    Search
  30. The bulk of our cases fall under this heading. Califano v. Jobst
    Search
  31. U.S. Supreme Court Califano v. Boles
    Search
  32. E.g., Weber v. Aetna
    Search
  33. Likewise, Weinberger v. Salfi
    Search
  34. See Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. Feeney
    Search
  35. Graham v. Richardson
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial