Citation network
Rose Vs. Mitchell
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jul 02, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 545 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Rose v. MitchellSearch
-
U.S. 545 (1979) Rose v. MitchellSearch
-
Amendment rights are vindicated in this context. Pp. 443 U. S. 557 -559. (c) The rationale of Stone v. PowellSearch
-
whether such claims should be cognizable any longer on federal habeas corpus in light of the decision in Stone v. PowellSearch
-
Alexander v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 370 , 103 U. S. 394 (1881). See Castaneda v. PartidaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
be set aside and the indictment returned by the unconstitutionally constituted grand jury be quashed. E.g., Hill v. TexasSearch
-
S. 552 Until today, only one Justice among those who have served on this Court in the 100 years since Strauder v. WestSearch
-
Virginia, 100 U. S. 303 (1880), has departed from this line of decisions. In his dissent in Cassell v. TexasSearch
-
cases in which it has reaffirmed the Strauder principle in the context of grand jury discrimination. E.g., Reece v. GeorgiaSearch
-
by grand jury discrimination, since an indictment only brings that defendant before the petit jury for trial. Pierre v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 354 , 306 U. S. 356 -358 (1939). See Cassell v. TexasSearch
-
Strauder v. WestSearch
-
Smith v. TexasSearch
-
Ballard v. UnitedSearch
-
when he is indicted by a grand jury from which members of a racial group purposefully have been excluded. E.g., Neal v. DelawareSearch
-
and all without regard to prejudice. Neal v. DelawareSearch
-
U.S. at 103 U. S. 394 , quoting Virginia v. RivesSearch
-
U. S. 313 , 100 U. S. 322 (1880). See Bush v. KentuckySearch
-
Page 443 U. S. 557 107 U.S. at 107 U. S. 119 . The Court in Hill v. TexasSearch
-
protection, which the Constitution commands for all, merely as we may deem the defendant innocent or guilty. Tumey v. OhioSearch
-
Hill v. TexasSearch
-
B The State makes the additional argument that the decision in Stone v. PowellSearch
-
on the ground of discrimination in the selection of the grand jury. MR. JUSTICE POWELL, dissenting in Castaneda v. PartidaSearch
-
case may be made that claims of grand jury discrimination are not cognizable on federal habeas corpus after Stone v. PowellSearch
-
only where the error alleged in support of that relief affected the determination of guilt. In this case, as in Stone v. PowellSearch
-
In Stone v. PowellSearch
-
on habeas of the Page 443 U. S. 561 Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule that the reasoning of Stone v. PowellSearch
-
Beyond this, there are fundamental differences between the claim here at issue and the claim at issue in Stone v. PowellSearch
-
fully to the States. In this context, the federalism concerns that motivated the Court to adopt the rule of Stone v. PowellSearch
-
relief to state prisoners upon proof of the proscribed discrimination for nearly a century. See, e.g., Virginia v. RivesSearch
-
U.S. at 491 n. 31, quoting Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
who is guilty in fact is less likely to go free, therefore, than in cases involving the exclusionary rule. Hill v. TexasSearch
-
relief outweighs the costs associated with such relief. We therefore decline to extend the rationale of Stone v. PowellSearch
-
Hernandez v. TexasSearch
-
in cases where this Court has found that a prima facie case was made out is most instructive. In Norris v. AlabamaSearch
-
Id. at 294 U. S. 591 . See Castaneda v. PartidaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Rose v. MitchellSearch
-
of Stone v. PowellSearch
-
See Castaneda v. PartidaSearch
-
E.g., Hill v. TexasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial