Citation network
Dayton Bd. of Educ. Vs. Brinkman
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jul 02, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 526 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Dayton Bd. of Educ. v. BrinkmanSearch
-
U.S. 526 (1979) Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSearch
-
eradicate racial separation in the public schools. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that, at the time of Brown v. BoardSearch
-
not to take any action that would impede the process of disestablishing the dual system and its effects, Wright v. CouncilSearch
-
caused by the dual system. The Dayton Board had to do more than abandon its prior discriminatory purpose, Keyes v. SchoolSearch
-
Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
is there any reason to fault the Court of Appeals' finding, after the remand of this case in Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSearch
-
Columbus Board of Education v. PenickSearch
-
in the courts below and has already resulted in one judgment and opinion by this Court. Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSearch
-
for the Sixth Circuit approved a systemwide plan for desegregating the public schools of Dayton, Ohio. Brinkman v. GilliganSearch
-
found that the Dayton Board of Education had operated a racially segregated, dual school system at the time of Brown v. BoardSearch
-
granted certiorari, 439 U.S. 1066 (1979), and heard argument in this case in tandem with Columbus Board of Education v. PenickSearch
-
Brinkman v. PageSearch
-
The Court of Appeals then affirmed. Brinkman v. GilliganSearch
-
Keyes v. SchoolSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
substantial number of black schools in the system at the time of Brown I. It had also ignored, contrary to Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
F.2d at 254 (emphasis in original), quoting Brinkman v. GilliganSearch
-
conduct. Id. at 258. Part of the affirmative duty imposed by our cases, as we decided in Wright v. CouncilSearch
-
any action that would impede the process of disestablishing the dual system and its effects. See also United States v. ScotlandSearch
-
Davis v. SchoolSearch
-
Washington v. DavisSearch
-
of the dual system serve important and legitimate ends. Wright, supra at 407 U. S. 467 , quoting Green v. CountySearch
-
Brinkman v. GilliganSearch
-
F.2d 243, 254 (CA6 1978) (emphasis in original), quoting Brinkman v. GilliganSearch
-
but to the extent that the Court of Appeals understood Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
of Swann. The Court of Appeals also held that the District Court had not given proper weight to Oliver v. MichiganSearch
-
whom MR. JUSTICE POWELL joins, dissenting. For the reasons set out in my dissent in Columbus Board of Education v. PenickSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Dayton Bd. of Educ. v. BrinkmanSearch
-
Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSearch
-
of Brown v. BoardSearch
-
Wright v. CouncilSearch
-
Court. Dayton Board of Education v. BrinkmanSearch
-
of Dayton, Ohio. Brinkman v. GilliganSearch
-
United States v. ScotlandSearch
-
Washington v. DavisSearch
-
Green v. CountySearch
-
Oliver v. MichiganSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial