Citation network
Ybarra Vs. Illinois
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 28, 1979
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 85 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court Ybarra v. IllinoisSearch
-
U.S. 85 (1979) Ybarra v. IllinoisSearch
-
suspected of criminal activity does not, without more, give rise to probable cause to search that person. Sibron v. NewSearch
-
the theory that the first search of appellant constituted a reasonable frisk for weapons under the doctrine of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of persons, not places. See Rakas v. IllinoisSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
find that the first pat-down search of Ybarra constituted a reasonable frisk for weapons under the doctrine of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
that he reasonably believes or suspects are then in the possession of the person he has accosted. See, e.g., Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
warrants are constitutionally prohibited. See Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. NewSearch
-
Marshall v. Barlow'sSearch
-
Dunaway v. NewSearch
-
York, 442 U.S. at 442 U. S. 208 , quoting Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
approach those in which the Court has said that a search may be made on less than probable cause. In addition to Terry v. OhioSearch
-
U. S. 1 , see, e.g., Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
Our decision last Term in Michigan v. DeFillippoSearch
-
cause, which the Court has not hesitated to hold invalid as authority for unconstitutional searches. See, e.g., Torres v. PuertoSearch
-
Almeida-Sanchez v. UnitedSearch
-
Sibron v. NewSearch
-
Berger v. NewSearch
-
since I cannot subscribe to the Court's unjustifiable narrowing of the rule of Page 444 U. S. 97 Terry v. OhioSearch
-
McMann v. SECSearch
-
valid warrant. This Court has had very few opportunities to consider the scope of such searches. An early case, Marron v. UnitedSearch
-
held that police could not seize one thing under a search warrant describing another thing. See also Steele v. UnitedSearch
-
authorizing search of building used as a garage empowers police to search connecting rooms). Three other cases, Berger v. NewSearch
-
and United States v. DonovanSearch
-
warrantless searches have offered dicta on the subject of searches pursuant to a warrant. See, e.g., Bivens v. SixSearch
-
Go-Bart Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
Hampshire, 403 U. S. 443 , 403 U. S. 474 (1971), quoting United States v. RabinowitzSearch
-
U. S. 66 (1950). MR. JUSTICE STEWART explained the current accommodation of the two clauses in Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
searches, whether those searches are pursuant to a warrant or not. See Go-Bart Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
searches extending beyond the place specified, cf. Steele v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, or seizures of Page 444 U. S. 102 persons or things other than those specified. Cf. Marron v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. at 415 U. S. 155 , n. 15, quoting United States v. FiorellaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ybarra v. IllinoisSearch
-
of Terry v. OhioSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial