Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Fulman Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 22, 1978

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 5 linked 31 unlinked
Show
  1. Bingler Vs. Johnson US Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1969
    Distinguished
  2. Muniz Vs. Hoffman US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1975
  3. Commissioner Vs. Acker US Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1959
  4. United States Vs. Correll US Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1967
  5. United States Vs. Ryder US Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1884
  6. Fulman v. United
    Search
  7. States - 434 U.S. 528 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court Fulman v. United
    Search
  8. States, 434 U.S. 528 (1978) Fulman v. United
    Search
  9. in this case, 545 F.2d 268 (1976), disagreeing with the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in H. Wetter Mfg. Co. v. United
    Search
  10. Ivan Allen Co. v. United
    Search
  11. shifted the incidence of this tax to the corporation itself, where it has remained to this day. See Ivan Allen Co. v. United
    Search
  12. personal holding company tax statute, and each expressly refused to follow the contrary holding of H. Wetter Mfg. Co. v. United
    Search
  13. U. S. 741 , 394 U. S. 749 -750 (1969), quoting Commissioner v. South
    Search
  14. United States v. Correll
    Search
  15. some rule of valuation must be applied, Congress, as we shall see, failed expressly to provide one. See United States v. Correll
    Search
  16. b) Page 434 U. S. 535 (1)(A). Indeed, H. Wetter Mfg Co. v. United
    Search
  17. States, 458 F.2d 1033 (1972), and Gulf Inland Corp. v. United
    Search
  18. forward the law existing prior to the 1954 Code with respect to the measure of valuation. As we said in United States v. Ryder
    Search
  19. Accord, Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. SCRAP
    Search
  20. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra
    Search
  21. Accord, Gulf Inland Corp. v. United
    Search
  22. WD La.), appeal docketed, No. 75-3767 (CA5 1975). But see C. Blake McDowell, Inc. v. Commissioner
    Search
  23. Although we have said that penalty tax provisions are to be strictly construed, see Ivan Allen Co. v. United
    Search
  24. House bill. See also nn. 13-14 infra. Finally, petitioners argue that our decision in Ivan Allen Co. v. United
    Search
  25. in Kind and Dividends Paid Deduction -- Conflict in the Circuits, 1977 B.Y.U.L.Rev. 45. See also H. Wetter Mfg. Co. v. United
    Search
  26. the distribution of appreciated and depreciated property in an advantageous manner. Cf. General Securities Co. v. Commissioner
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court Fulman v. United
    Search
  28. H. Wetter Mfg. Co. v. United
    Search
  29. Ivan Allen Co. v. United
    Search
  30. of H. Wetter Mfg. Co. v. United
    Search
  31. Commissioner v. South
    Search
  32. See United States v. Correll
    Search
  33. (1)(A). Indeed, H. Wetter Mfg Co. v. United
    Search
  34. and Gulf Inland Corp. v. United
    Search
  35. C. Blake McDowell, Inc. v. Commissioner
    Search
  36. Cf. General Securities Co. v. Commissioner
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial