Citation network
Simpson Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 28, 1978
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Simpson v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 435 U.S. 6 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court Simpson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 435 U.S. 6 (1978) Simpson v. UnitedSearch
-
Rewis v. UnitedSearch
-
conflict between the decision below and the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in United States v. EagleSearch
-
c) creates an offense distinct from the underlying federal felony, United States v. RamirezSearch
-
United States v. SudduthSearch
-
of the analysis necessary to answer the question presented for decision. Page 435 U. S. 11 In Blockburger v. UnitedSearch
-
Brown v. OhioSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Blockburger v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra at 284 U. S. 304 . See also Brown v. OhioSearch
-
Ianelli v. UnitedSearch
-
Gore v. UnitedSearch
-
for double jeopardy purposes. Brown v. OhioSearch
-
to subject the defendant to multiple penalties for the single criminal transaction in which he engaged. Jeffers v. UnitedSearch
-
d). Cf. Gore v. UnitedSearch
-
c). United States v. EagleSearch
-
Page 435 U. S. 15 Rewis v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 401 U. S. 808 , 401 U. S. 812 (1971). See Adamo Wrecking Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Bell v. UnitedSearch
-
Ladner v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 358 U. S. 169 (1958). See Prince v. UnitedSearch
-
statute and a specific statute speak to the same concern, even if the general provision was enacted later. See Preiser v. RodriguezSearch
-
Together with No. 76-5796, Simpson v. UnitedSearch
-
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in these cases are the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, United States v. CrewSearch
-
F.2d 575 (1976), and the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Perkins v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. MelvilleSearch
-
Jeers v. UnitedSearch
-
d) is to be read as the Government reads it include United States v. CrewSearch
-
supra at 577. See Perkins v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BeasleySearch
-
F.2d 400 (CA7 1969). See United States v. CoulterSearch
-
d), we have implicitly given it the same gloss as the Government. Prince v. UnitedSearch
-
is, like all other canons, only a guide to enable this Court to perform its function. As the Court said in Shapiro v. UnitedSearch
-
well as the language of the statute itself may be used to interpret the meaning of statutory language, United States v. AmericanSearch
-
the remarks even of the sponsor of a particular portion of a bill on the floor of the chamber. See, e.g., Chandler v. RoudebushSearch
-
United States v. AutomobileSearch
-
this construction were adopted, problems of double jeopardy would be raised by virtue of our decision in Blockburger v. UnitedSearch
-
is to use the language of metaphysics, rather than of constitutional law. Page 435 U. S. 19 Brown v. OhioSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Simpson v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. EagleSearch
-
In Blockburger v. UnitedSearch
-
Jeffers v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Gore v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial