Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Oliphant Vs. Suquamish Indian Tribe

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 06, 1978

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 6 linked 31 unlinked
Show
  1. Morris Vs. Hitchcock US Supreme Court · May 16, 1904
  2. Fletcher Vs. Peck US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1810
  3. United States Vs. Kagama US Supreme Court · May 10, 1886
  4. United States Vs. Nice US Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1916
  5. Morton Vs. Mancari US Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1974
  6. Cherokee Nation Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1831
  7. Oliphant v. Suquamish
    Search
  8. Indian Tribe - 435 U.S. 191 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court Oliphant v. Suquamish
    Search
  9. Indian Tribe, 435 U.S. 191 (1978) Oliphant v. Suquamish
    Search
  10. of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of habeas corpus in the case of petitioner Oliphant. Oliphant v. Schlie
    Search
  11. Morton v. Mancari
    Search
  12. federal courts that tribal courts do not have the power to try non-Indians carries considerable weight. Cf. Draper v. United
    Search
  13. Warren Trading Post Co. v. Arizona
    Search
  14. DeCoteau v. District
    Search
  15. As Mr. Chief Justice Marshall explained in Worcester v. Georgia
    Search
  16. their lands to the United States and announcing their dependence on the Federal Government. See Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
    Search
  17. Oliphant v. Schlie
    Search
  18. United States v. Rogers
    Search
  19. Johnson v. M'Intosh
    Search
  20. of the inherent limitations on tribal powers that stem from their incorporation into the United States. In Johnson v. M'Intosh
    Search
  21. was inherently lost to the overriding sovereignty of the United States. And in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
    Search
  22. Together with Belgarde v. Suquamish
    Search
  23. In Talton v. Mayes
    Search
  24. this issue, as reflected in the judgments of Congress itself, have changed from one era to the next. See Kake Village v. Egan
    Search
  25. Courts of Appeals have read this language to exclude tribal jurisdiction over the Indian offender. See, e.g., Sam v. United
    Search
  26. Felicia v. United
    Search
  27. McClanahan v. Arizona
    Search
  28. Cf. DeCoteau v. District
    Search
  29. U.S. Supreme Court Oliphant v. Suquamish
    Search
  30. Oliphant. Oliphant v. Schlie
    Search
  31. Cf. Draper v. United
    Search
  32. Worcester v. Georgia
    Search
  33. the Federal Government. See Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
    Search
  34. the United States. In Johnson v. M'Intosh
    Search
  35. Belgarde v. Suquamish
    Search
  36. See Kake Village v. Egan
    Search
  37. Sam v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial