Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Ceccolini

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 21, 1978

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

44 entries 3 linked 41 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Calandra US Supreme Court · Jan 08, 1974
  2. United States Vs. Bayer US Supreme Court · Jun 09, 1947
  3. United States Vs. Janis US Supreme Court · Jul 06, 1976
  4. U.S. 268 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Ceccolini
    Search
  5. U.S. 268 (1978) United States v. Ceccolini
    Search
  6. no further proceedings in the District Court, but merely a reinstatement of the finding of guilt. United States v. Morrison
    Search
  7. United States v. Wilson
    Search
  8. Graver Mfg. Co. v. Linde
    Search
  9. and the ultimate trial of the accused. The constitutional question under the Fourth Amendment was phrased in Wong Sun v. United
    Search
  10. S. 487 , 371 U. S. 491 . The question was, in turn, derived from the Court's earlier decision in Nardone v. United
    Search
  11. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United
    Search
  12. is material, as are certain other factors enumerated below to which the court gave insufficient weight. In Stone v. Powell
    Search
  13. to prohibit the use of such evidence for the purpose of impeaching a defendant who testifies in his own behalf. Walder v. United
    Search
  14. Alderman v. United
    Search
  15. witness testimony, which somehow came to light through a chain of causation that began with an illegal arrest. Brown v. Illinois
    Search
  16. Brown v. Illinois
    Search
  17. Smith v. United
    Search
  18. whose identity was disclosed by the defendant's statement given after inadequate Miranda warnings. Michigan v. Tucker
    Search
  19. McGuire v. United
    Search
  20. deterrence of official misconduct. See Stone v. Powell
    Search
  21. Blocker v. United
    Search
  22. Burger, J., concurring in result). Mr. Justice Jackson expressed this in Gregg Cartage & Storage Co. v. United
    Search
  23. And in Steward Machine Co. v. Davis
    Search
  24. Pears & McGuinness trans.1961). In Smith v. United
    Search
  25. direct appreciable effect on a policeman's behavior in most situations -- emergency actions in particular. See Bivens v. Six
    Search
  26. the holding of Wong Sun v. United
    Search
  27. Harrison v. United
    Search
  28. Nardone v. United
    Search
  29. is gained from a source independent of police illegality, the evidence should be admitted. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United
    Search
  30. police investigation. Assuming such evidence is admissible -- a proposition that has been questioned, Fitzpatrick v. New
    Search
  31. tax case -- will be as costly to the same societal interests. But other, more important societal interests, see Brown v. Illinois
    Search
  32. Wong Sun v. United
    Search
  33. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Ceccolini
    Search
  34. In Stone v. Powell
    Search
  35. Walder v. United
    Search
  36. Michigan v. Tucker
    Search
  37. See Stone v. Powell
    Search
  38. Gregg Cartage & Storage Co. v. United
    Search
  39. Steward Machine Co. v. Davis
    Search
  40. In Smith v. United
    Search
  41. See Bivens v. Six
    Search
  42. of Wong Sun v. United
    Search
  43. Fitzpatrick v. New
    Search
  44. United States v. Morrison
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial