Citation network
Foley Vs. Connelie
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 22, 1978
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 291 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court Foley v. ConnelieSearch
-
U.S. 291 (1978) Foley v. ConnelieSearch
-
that such legislation is inherently invalid, nor have we held that all limitations on aliens are suspect. See Sugarman v. DougallSearch
-
Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
pending their eligibility for citizenship -- have no direct voice in the political processes. See United States v. CaroleneSearch
-
resulted requiring state action to meet close scrutiny to exclude aliens as a class from educational benefits, Nyquist v. MaucletSearch
-
eligibility for a broad range of public employment, Sugarman v. DougallSearch
-
or the practice of licensed professions, Examining Board v. FloresSearch
-
Similar considerations support a legislative determination to exclude aliens from jury service. See Perkins v. SmithSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
police may, in the exercise of their discretion, invade the privacy of an individual in public places, e.g., Terry v. OhioSearch
-
some conditions, break down a door to enter a dwelling or other building in the execution of a warrant, e.g., Miller v. UnitedSearch
-
they may stop vehicles traveling on public highways, e.g., Pennsylvania v. MimmsSearch
-
that the then Mr. Justice Hughes referred to in Truax v. RaichSearch
-
granted to the police rests on the difficult and delicate judgments these officers must often make. See Pierson v. RaySearch
-
Scheuer v. RhodesSearch
-
After the event, some abuses of power may be subject to remedies by one showing injury. See Bivens v. SixSearch
-
Cf. McCarthy v. PhiladelphiaSearch
-
Detroit Police Officers Assn. v. DetroitSearch
-
Although I have joined the Court in striking down citizenship requirements of this kind, see Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
Examining Board v. FloresSearch
-
de Otero, 426 U. S. 572 (1976), including, specifically, some imposed by the State of New York, see Sugarman v. DougallSearch
-
and Nyquist v. MaucletSearch
-
decided just last Term, is our most recent pronouncement in this area of constitutional law. There, citing Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
U.S. at 432 U. S. 7 . In the same opinion, however, limitations were intimated when, citing Sugarman v. DougallSearch
-
One of the appellees in Nyquist v. MaucletSearch
-
JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE STEVENS join, dissenting. Almost a century ago, in the landmark case of Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. Eighty-five years later, in Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
occasions, finding Page 435 U. S. 303 that such discrimination could not survive strict scrutiny. Sugarman v. DougallSearch
-
a law excluding aliens from public employment as state troopers. It bases its decision largely on dictum from Sugarman v. DougallSearch
-
Ibid., quoting Dunn v. BlumsteinSearch
-
See United States v. RousseSearch
-
United States v. VialeSearch
-
taking the action, see United States v. SwarovskiSearch
-
United States v. RousseSearch
-
reference to the law governing denial of public employment for political reasons is nevertheless instructive. In Elrod v. BurnsSearch
-
described in Sugarman v. DougallSearch
-
the Court placed the police officer in a different category from the Governor of Ohio. See Scheuer v. RhodesSearch
-
U. S. 232 , 416 U. S. 245 -247. And under Elrod v. BurnsSearch
-
Hampton v. MowSearch
-
squarely held that a State may not treat employment as a scarce resource to be reserved for its own citizens. Sugarman v. DougallSearch
-
may a State impose special burdens on aliens to provide them with an incentive to become naturalized citizens. Nyquist v. MaucletSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Foley v. ConnelieSearch
-
See Sugarman v. DougallSearch
-
See United States v. CaroleneSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial