Citation network
Mcdaniel Vs. Paty
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 19, 1978
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 618 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court McDaniel v. PatySearch
-
U.S. 618 (1978) McDaniel v. PatySearch
-
is inapposite here. Torcaso v. WatkinsSearch
-
it conditions his right to the free exercise of his religion on the surrender of his right to seek office. Sherbert v. VernerSearch
-
establishes a religious classification governing eligibility for office that is absolutely prohibited. Torcaso v. WatkinsSearch
-
primary effect of inhibiting religion. Pp. 435 U. S. 636 -642. MR. JUSTICE STEWART concluded that Torcaso v. WatkinsSearch
-
s provision violative of the First and Fourteenth Amendments' guarantees of the free exercise of religion. Kirkley v. MarylandSearch
-
other similar religious functions, or, in other words, to be a minister of the type McDaniel was found to be. Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
supra at 310 U. S. 304 . In Torcaso v. WatkinsSearch
-
enjoy significant First Amendment protection. The Court Page 435 U. S. 628 recently declared, in Wisconsin v. YoderSearch
-
pitting one against the others, contrary to the anti-establishment principle with its command of neutrality. See Walz v. TaxSearch
-
prohibitions on handling venomous snakes or drinking poison, even as part of a religious ceremony, State ex rel. Swann v. PackSearch
-
State v. MasseySearch
-
N.C. 734, 51 S.E.2d 179, appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question sub nom. Bunn v. NorthSearch
-
U.S. 942 (1949), but have precluded the application of criminal sanctions to the religious use of peyote, People v. WoodySearch
-
Oliver v. UdallSearch
-
issue), or the religiously impelled refusal to comply with mandatory education laws past the eighth grade, Wisconsin v. YoderSearch
-
of the general nature of free exercise protections and the delicate balancing required by our decisions in Sherbert v. VernerSearch
-
U. S. 398 (1963), and Wisconsin v. YoderSearch
-
the ministry as much establishes a religious test as one which disqualifies Catholics, or Jews, or Protestants. Wieman v. UpdegraffSearch
-
establishes as a condition of office the willingness to eschew certain protected religious practices, Torcaso v. WatkinsSearch
-
but merely conditions eligibility for office on its abandonment -- is also squarely rejected by precedent. In Sherbert v. VernerSearch
-
and, in sum, has a primary effect which inhibits religion. See Everson v. BoardSearch
-
McCollum v. BoardSearch
-
the Fourteenth Amendment, the strictures of the First Amendment became wholly applicable to the States, see Cantwell v. ConnecticutSearch
-
Everson v. BoardSearch
-
U. S. 270 (1964). Government may not interfere with efforts to proselyte or worship in public places. Kunz v. NewSearch
-
York, 340 U. S. 290 (1951). It may not tax the dissemination of religious ideas. Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
It may not seek to shield its citizens from those who would solicit them with their religious beliefs. Martin v. CitySearch
-
Terminiello v. ChicagoSearch
-
Walz v. TaxSearch
-
of their status as such, as subversive of American ideals, and therefore subject to unique disabilities. Cf. Wieman v. UpdegraffSearch
-
statements regarding religion, or question whether their legislative actions stem from religious conviction. Cf. Bond v. FloydSearch
-
Abington School Dist, v. SchemppSearch
-
U. S. 398 , 374 U. S. 403 (1963) (citations omitted), in part quoting Braunfeld v. BrownSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court McDaniel v. PatySearch
-
Kirkley v. MarylandSearch
-
Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
In Torcaso v. WatkinsSearch
-
Wisconsin v. YoderSearch
-
See Walz v. TaxSearch
-
Swann v. PackSearch
-
Bunn v. NorthSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial