Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Macdonald

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 01, 1978

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

50 entries 3 linked 47 unlinked
Show
  1. Stack Vs. Boyle US Supreme Court · Nov 05, 1951
    Relied / Followed
  2. Barker Vs. Wingo US Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1972
  3. United States Vs. Marion US Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1971
  4. U.S. 850 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. MacDonald
    Search
  5. U.S. 850 (1978) United States v. MacDonald
    Search
  6. denial of his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. App. to Pet. for Cert. 44a, 46a, 49a. Relying on United States v. Marion
    Search
  7. Fourth Circuit stayed the trial and allowed an interlocutory appeal on the authority of its decision in United States v. Lansdown
    Search
  8. II This Court frequently has considered the appealability of pretrial orders in criminal cases. See, e.g., Abney v. United
    Search
  9. DiBella v. United
    Search
  10. Parr v. United
    Search
  11. Cobbledick v. United
    Search
  12. Abney v. United
    Search
  13. States, 431 U.S. at 431 U. S. 656 . See also DiBella v. United
    Search
  14. States, 309 U.S. at 309 U. S. 325 . See also DiBella v. United
    Search
  15. Court, in criminal cases, has twice departed from the general prohibition against piecemeal appellate review. Abney v. United
    Search
  16. exception articulated in Cohen v. Beneficial
    Search
  17. Page 435 U. S. 855 however, rested on several grounds. Those grounds were summarized in Abney v. United
    Search
  18. in a criminal proceeding, holding that an order denying a motion to reduce bail could be reviewed before trial. Stack v. Boyle
    Search
  19. trial grounds does not satisfy those criteria. The considerations that militated in favor of appealability in Stack v. Boyle
    Search
  20. supra, and in Abney v. United
    Search
  21. we hold that the Court of Appeals lacked jurisdiction to entertain respondent's speedy trial appeal. United States v. Bailey
    Search
  22. Kyle v. United
    Search
  23. of the defendant's claim. Abney v. United
    Search
  24. trial claims, therefore, are best considered only after the relevant facts have been developed at trial. In Barker v. Wingo
    Search
  25. upheld a pretrial appeal by a criminal defendant, the order sought to be reviewed clearly fit this description. Abney v. United
    Search
  26. U.S. at 337 U. S. 546 . The double jeopardy claim in Abney, the demand for reduced bail in Stack v. Boyle
    Search
  27. trial itself, that offends against the constitutional guarantee of a speedy trial. If the factors outlined in Barker v. Wingo
    Search
  28. U.S. at 407 U. S. 519 . See also United States v. Avalos
    Search
  29. to pretrial detention, and prolong the period during which defendants released on bail may commit other crimes. Dickey v. Florida
    Search
  30. circumstances that will support a speedy trial claim which inherently limits the availability of the claim. See Barker v. Wingo
    Search
  31. Respondent's discharge barred any further military proceeding against him. United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles
    Search
  32. Respondent would rely on United States v. Marion
    Search
  33. to his double jeopardy claim is vitiated by Abney v. United
    Search
  34. jeopardy claim over which the appellate court does have interlocutory appellate jurisdiction. See also United States v. Cerilli
    Search
  35. Carroll v. United
    Search
  36. the indictment to be the proper remedy when the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial has been violated, see Strunk v. United
    Search
  37. however, this has not led the Court to conclude that such defendants can pursue interlocutory appeals. Abney v. United
    Search
  38. Cogen v. United
    Search
  39. Heike v. United
    Search
  40. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. MacDonald
    Search
  41. United States v. Lansdown
    Search
  42. Cohen v. Beneficial
    Search
  43. In Barker v. Wingo
    Search
  44. United States v. Avalos
    Search
  45. Dickey v. Florida
    Search
  46. See Barker v. Wingo
    Search
  47. Toth v. Quarles
    Search
  48. United States v. Cerilli
    Search
  49. Strunk v. United
    Search
  50. United States v. Bailey
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial