Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Scott Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 15, 1978

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

50 entries 5 linked 45 unlinked
Show
  1. Doe Vs. Bolton US Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1973
  2. United States Vs. Kahn US Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1974
  3. United States Vs. Cox US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1837
  4. United States Vs. Janis US Supreme Court · Jul 06, 1976
  5. United States Vs. Ceccolini US Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1978
  6. Scott v. United
    Search
  7. States - 436 U.S. 128 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court Scott v. United
    Search
  8. States, 436 U.S. 128 (1978) Scott v. United
    Search
  9. ed.). In this Act, Congress, after this Court's decisions in Berger v. New
    Search
  10. York, 388 U. S. 41 (1967), and Katz v. United
    Search
  11. searches and seizures. In Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  12. Footnotes omitted.) See also Beck v. Ohio
    Search
  13. Henry v. United
    Search
  14. invalidate the action taken as long as the circumstances, viewed objectively, justify that action. In United States v. Robinson
    Search
  15. S.Rep. No 1097, 90th Cong., 2d Sess., 96 (1968). See Alderman v. United
    Search
  16. See United States v. Donovan
    Search
  17. Katz v. United
    Search
  18. Berger v. New
    Search
  19. which were illegally intercepted, not suppression of all the intercepted conversations. See, e.g., United States v. Cox
    Search
  20. United States v. Sisca
    Search
  21. United States v. Mainello
    Search
  22. United States v. LaGorga
    Search
  23. violated. This, argues the Government, would contravene well settled principles of Fourth Amendment law, cf. Brown v. United
    Search
  24. Alderman v. United
    Search
  25. Simmons v. United
    Search
  26. as well. In this circumstance, we need not decide the questions of Scott's standing. See California Bankers Assn. v. Shultz
    Search
  27. United States v. Bugarin-Casas
    Search
  28. Dodd v. Beto
    Search
  29. Klingler v. United
    Search
  30. Green v. United
    Search
  31. Sirimarco v. United
    Search
  32. may have some relevance in determining the propriety of applying the exclusionary rule. For example, in United States v. Janis
    Search
  33. United States v. Ceccolini
    Search
  34. Moreover, today's decision does not take even a sidelong glance at United States v. Kahn
    Search
  35. of authorized electronic surveillance in a manner that violates the constitutional guidelines announced in Berger v. New
    Search
  36. Bynum v. United
    Search
  37. United States v. Chavez
    Search
  38. See United States v. Kahn
    Search
  39. unimpaired by the Court will clearly require suppression of interceptions in other circumstances. See, e.g., Bynum v. United
    Search
  40. Accord, United States v. Kahn
    Search
  41. U.S. Supreme Court Scott v. United
    Search
  42. and Katz v. United
    Search
  43. In Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  44. Beck v. Ohio
    Search
  45. In United States v. Robinson
    Search
  46. See Alderman v. United
    Search
  47. Brown v. United
    Search
  48. See California Bankers Assn. v. Shultz
    Search
  49. United States v. Bugarin-Casas
    Search
  50. United States v. Chavez
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial