Citation network
Scott Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 15, 1978
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Scott v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 436 U.S. 128 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court Scott v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 436 U.S. 128 (1978) Scott v. UnitedSearch
-
ed.). In this Act, Congress, after this Court's decisions in Berger v. NewSearch
-
York, 388 U. S. 41 (1967), and Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
searches and seizures. In Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Footnotes omitted.) See also Beck v. OhioSearch
-
Henry v. UnitedSearch
-
invalidate the action taken as long as the circumstances, viewed objectively, justify that action. In United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
S.Rep. No 1097, 90th Cong., 2d Sess., 96 (1968). See Alderman v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
See United States v. DonovanSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Berger v. NewSearch
-
which were illegally intercepted, not suppression of all the intercepted conversations. See, e.g., United States v. CoxSearch
-
United States v. SiscaSearch
-
United States v. MainelloSearch
-
United States v. LaGorgaSearch
-
violated. This, argues the Government, would contravene well settled principles of Fourth Amendment law, cf. Brown v. UnitedSearch
-
Alderman v. UnitedSearch
-
Simmons v. UnitedSearch
-
as well. In this circumstance, we need not decide the questions of Scott's standing. See California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSearch
-
United States v. Bugarin-CasasSearch
-
Dodd v. BetoSearch
-
Klingler v. UnitedSearch
-
Green v. UnitedSearch
-
Sirimarco v. UnitedSearch
-
may have some relevance in determining the propriety of applying the exclusionary rule. For example, in United States v. JanisSearch
-
United States v. CeccoliniSearch
-
Moreover, today's decision does not take even a sidelong glance at United States v. KahnSearch
-
of authorized electronic surveillance in a manner that violates the constitutional guidelines announced in Berger v. NewSearch
-
Bynum v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ChavezSearch
-
See United States v. KahnSearch
-
unimpaired by the Court will clearly require suppression of interceptions in other circumstances. See, e.g., Bynum v. UnitedSearch
-
Accord, United States v. KahnSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Scott v. UnitedSearch
-
and Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
In Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Beck v. OhioSearch
-
In United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
See Alderman v. UnitedSearch
-
Brown v. UnitedSearch
-
See California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSearch
-
United States v. Bugarin-CasasSearch
-
United States v. ChavezSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial