Citation network
Sec Vs. Sloan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 15, 1978
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 103 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court SEC v. SloanSearch
-
U.S. 103 (1978) Securities and Exchange Commission v. SloanSearch
-
will be subjected to the same action again. Cf. Weinstein v. BradfordSearch
-
its administrative construction with a contemporaneous well reasoned explanation of its action. Adamo Wrecking Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
F.2d at 158, quoting from Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICCSearch
-
Brief for Petitioner 15, quoting from Pet. for Cert. 12 n. 7. Cf. Weinstein v. BradfordSearch
-
before us this case falls squarely within the general principle first enunciated in Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICCSearch
-
supra, and further clarified in Weinstein v. BradfordSearch
-
s protestations to the contrary notwithstanding, there is a reasonable expectation, within the meaning of Weinstein v. BradfordSearch
-
If extension of the summary suspension power is desirable, the proper source of that power is Congress. Cf. FMC v. SeatrainSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
has been both consistent and longstanding, dating from 1944. It is thus entitled to great deference. See United States v. NationalSearch
-
detail the statutory authorization under which it took that action. As we said just this Term in Adamo Wrecking Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
attention to the statutory authorization is especially important in light of this Court's pronouncement in Skidmore v. SwiftSearch
-
deference by the courts, and ordinarily that construction will be affirmed if it has a 'reasonable basis in law.' NLRB v. HearstSearch
-
Unemployment Commission v. AragonSearch
-
U. S. 153 -154. But the courts are the final authorities on issues of statutory construction, FTC v. Colgate-PalmoliveSearch
-
they deem inconsistent with a statutory mandate or that frustrate the congressional policy underlying a statute.' NLRB v. BrownSearch
-
Volkswagenwerk v. FMCSearch
-
with the statutory mandate. We explicitly contemplated just this Page 436 U. S. 119 situation in FMC v. SeatrainSearch
-
See Zuber v. AllenSearch
-
Fribourg Navigation Co. v. CommissionerSearch
-
illustrated by the cases upon which the Commission relies, we do not believe it to be applicable here. In Zuber v. AllenSearch
-
k). On this point, the present case differs significantly from United States v. CorrellSearch
-
suffered collateral legal consequences from the series of suspension orders, and thus the case is not moot. Cf. Sibron v. NewSearch
-
under which an agency purports to operate. Ante at 436 U. S. 117 , quoting Adamo Wrecking Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 436 U. S. 126 noted in dissent in Adamo, see id. at 434 U. S. 302 , Norwegian Nitrogen Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
is excised, presumably as permitted (but not required) by Exemption 5 of the Freedom of Information Act, see EPA v. MinkSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court SEC v. SloanSearch
-
Securities and Exchange Commission v. SloanSearch
-
Cf. Weinstein v. BradfordSearch
-
Adamo Wrecking Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
of Weinstein v. BradfordSearch
-
Congress. Cf. FMC v. SeatrainSearch
-
See United States v. NationalSearch
-
Skidmore v. SwiftSearch
-
NLRB v. HearstSearch
-
FTC v. Colgate-PalmoliveSearch
-
NLRB v. BrownSearch
-
FMC v. SeatrainSearch
-
In Zuber v. AllenSearch
-
Cf. Sibron v. NewSearch
-
Norwegian Nitrogen Co. v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial