Citation network
Kulko Vs. Superior Ct.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 15, 1978
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Kulko v. SuperiorSearch
-
Ct. - 436 U.S. 84 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court Kulko v. SuperiorSearch
-
Ct., 436 U.S. 84 (1978) Kulko v. SuperiorSearch
-
with that State under International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSearch
-
International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSearch
-
supra, at 326 U. S. 316 , quoting Milliken v. MeyerSearch
-
her mother in California was not enough to confer jurisdiction over appellant in the California courts. See Shaffer v. HeitnerSearch
-
with the State under International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
jurisdiction of state courts to enter judgments affecting rights or interests of nonresident defendants. See Shaffer v. HeitnerSearch
-
favor of the plaintiff may be entered only by a court having jurisdiction over the person of the defendant. Pennoyer v. NeffSearch
-
in turn, depends upon the presence of reasonable notice to the defendant that an action has been brought, Mullane v. CentralSearch
-
between the defendant and the forum State to make it fair to require defense of the action in the forum. Milliken v. MeyerSearch
-
enter a binding Judgment against appellant here is that set forth in this Court's opinion in International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSearch
-
U.S. at 326 U. S. 316 , quoting Milliken v. MeyerSearch
-
plaintiff in proceeding with the cause in the plaintiff's forum of choice are, of course, to be considered, see McGee v. InternationalSearch
-
to require him to conduct his defense in that State. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSearch
-
supra at 326 U. S. 316 -317, 326 U. S. 319 . Accord, Shaffer v. HeitnerSearch
-
Perkins v. BenguetSearch
-
are present. Hanson v. DencklaSearch
-
of California's laws. See Shaffer v. HeitnerSearch
-
physical injury on either Page 436 U. S. 97 property or persons within the State of California. Cf. Hess v. PawloskiSearch
-
s sending an insurance contract and premium notices into the State to an insured resident of the State. Cf. McGee v. InternationalSearch
-
seeks modification of a contract that was negotiated in New York and that she flew to New York to sign. As in Hanson v. DencklaSearch
-
has remained in the State of the marital domicile, whereas it is appellee who has moved across the continent. Cf. May v. AndersonSearch
-
of appellant's activities in or relating to the State of California. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSearch
-
for choice of law purposes does not mean that California has personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Hanson v. DencklaSearch
-
interest in trying such cases in its courts by, e.g., enacting a special jurisdictional statute. Cf. McGee v. InternationalSearch
-
U.S. at 357 U. S. 251 . In McGee v. InternationalSearch
-
As was true in both Hanson v. DencklaSearch
-
U. S. 235 (1958), and May v. AndersonSearch
-
the subject matter of the lawsuit would be entitled to full faith and credit in any State. See New York ex rel. Halvey v. HalveySearch
-
U. S. 610 , 330 U. S. 614 (1947). See also Sosna v. IowaSearch
-
Santa Clara County v. HughesSearch
-
in the 1968 Act. See n 13, supra. See generally Note, 48 Cornell L.Q. 541 (1963). In Landes v. LandesSearch
-
The constitutionality of these procedures has also been upheld in other jurisdictions. See, e.g., Watson v. DreadinSearch
-
Terry v. TerrySearch
-
Thus, it cannot here be concluded, as it was in McGee v. InternationalSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Kulko v. SuperiorSearch
-
See Shaffer v. HeitnerSearch
-
Mullane v. CentralSearch
-
McGee v. InternationalSearch
-
State. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSearch
-
Accord, Shaffer v. HeitnerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial