Citation network
Marshall Vs. Barlow's, Inc.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 23, 1978
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Marshall v. Barlow'sSearch
-
Inc. - 436 U.S. 307 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court Marshall v. Barlow'sSearch
-
Inc., 436 U.S. 307 (1978) Marshall v. Barlow'sSearch
-
of OSHA regulations. A three-judge District Court ruled in appellee's favor, concluding, in reliance on Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
Court, 387 U. S. 523 , 387 U. S. 528 -529, and See v. SeattleSearch
-
The rule that warrantless searches are generally unreasonable applies to commercial premises as well as homes. Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
Court, supra, and See v. SeattleSearch
-
Colonnade Catering Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
court was convened. On December 30, 1976, it ruled in Mr. Barlow's favor. 424 F.Supp. 437. Concluding that Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
Court, 387 U. S. 523 , 387 U. S. 528 -529 (1967), and See v. SeattleSearch
-
U. S. 1 , 433 U. S. 7 -8 (1977). Page 436 U. S. 312 See also G. M. Leasing Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
searches are generally unreasonable, and that this rule applies to commercial premises as well as homes. In Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
See v. SeattleSearch
-
standards. It therefore appears that, unless some recognized exception to the warrant requirement applies, See v. SeattleSearch
-
Certain industries have such a history of government oversight that no reasonable expectation of privacy, see Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Almeida-Sanchez v. UnitedSearch
-
a Colonnde-Biswell type exception by drawing analogies from the field of labor law. In Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRBSearch
-
over the intrusion of nonemployee organizers, even in nonworking area of the plant and during nonworking hours. NLRB v. BabcockSearch
-
Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
Camara Page 436 U. S. 321 v. MunicipalSearch
-
Cf. Air Pollution Variance Bd. v. WesternSearch
-
both the car and the driver, and the more available opportunity for plain view observations of a car's contents. Cady v. DombrowskiSearch
-
Chambers v. MaroneySearch
-
of a search generally depends upon whether it was conducted pursuant to a valid warrant. See, e.g., Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
first Clause even though the probable cause requirement of the Warrant Clause cannot be satisfied. See United States v. Martinez-FuerteSearch
-
in the Warrant Clause. South Dakota v. OppermanSearch
-
lawful limits of the inspection, and to assure him that the person demanding entry is an authorized inspector. Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
signature. If the employer still has doubts, he may make a toll-free call to verify the inspector's authority, Usery v. GodfreySearch
-
States, 413 U. S. 266 , 413 U. S. 290 (WHITE, J., dissenting). In United States v. Martinez-FuerteSearch
-
Page 436 U. S. 336 G. M. Leasing Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 429 U. S. 338 , 429 U. S. 353 . Thus, in Colonnade Catering Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 397 U. S. 76 . And in United States v. BiswellSearch
-
even though those practices involved significantly more individual discretion than the OSHA program. See, e.g., Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
What the Court actually decided in Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
Court, 387 U. S. 523 , and See v. SeattleSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Marshall v. Barlow'sSearch
-
and See v. SeattleSearch
-
G. M. Leasing Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
In Camara v. MunicipalSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
In Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRBSearch
-
NLRB v. BabcockSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial