Citation network
United States Vs. Scott
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 14, 1978
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 82 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ScottSearch
-
U.S. 82 (1978) United States v. ScottSearch
-
of Appeals, concluding that that Clause barred further prosecution, dismissed the appeal, relying on United States v. JenkinsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
ed.). United States v. JerkinsSearch
-
of a judgment of conviction, except on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, Burks v. UnitedSearch
-
his part to forgo his valued right to have his guilt or innocence determined by the first trier of fact. United States v. DinitzSearch
-
require further trial court proceedings leading to the factual resolution of the issue of guilt or innocence, see Lee v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MartinSearch
-
to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. That court, relying on our opinion in United States v. JenkinsSearch
-
no right of Page 437 U. S. 85 appeal in a criminal case, absent explicit statutory authority. United States v. SangesSearch
-
United States v. WilsonSearch
-
though our assessment of the history and meaning of the Double Jeopardy Clause in Wilson, Jenkins, and Serfass v. UnitedSearch
-
Green v. UnitedSearch
-
presented by the challenge of verdicts on appeal. And, in the very first case presenting the issues, United States v. BallSearch
-
convicted, the other acquitted. This Court reversed the convictions, finding the indictment fatally defective, Ball v. UnitedSearch
-
the years after Ball, was faced with that question only in unusual circumstances, such as were present in Kepner v. UnitedSearch
-
More than 50 years later, in Fong Foo v. UnitedSearch
-
Clause. Id. at 369 U. S. 143 . Only last Term, this Court relied upon these precedents in United States v. MartinSearch
-
on any ground other than the insufficiency of Page 437 U. S. 91 the evidence to support the verdict, Burks v. UnitedSearch
-
is most pithily, if not most elegantly, expressed in the words of Mr. Justice McLean on circuit in United States v. KeenSearch
-
Although the primary purpose of the Double Jeopardy Clause was to protect the integrity of a final judgment, see Crist v. BretzSearch
-
that the prosecutor will be permitted to proceed anew notwithstanding the defendant's plea of double jeopardy. See Lee v. UnitedSearch
-
Downum v. UnitedSearch
-
to offenders. Our very first encounter with this situation came in United Page 437 U. S. 93 States v. PerezSearch
-
Id. at 22 U. S. 580 . In our recent decision in Arizona v. WashingtonSearch
-
trial court's discretion must be exercised with a careful regard for the interests first described in United States v. PerezSearch
-
Arizona v. WashingtonSearch
-
Court chosen to grant it at that time the Government could have appealed the ruling under our holding in Serfass v. UnitedSearch
-
lie at the core of the area protected by the Double Jeopardy Clause. As we have recognized in cases from United States v. BallSearch
-
U. S. 662 (1896), to Sanabria v. UnitedSearch
-
Jorn, 400 U.S. at 400 U. S. 478 n. 7 (opinion of Harlan, J.), citing United States v. SissonSearch
-
United States v. RussellSearch
-
Page 437 U. S. 101 Wade v. HunterSearch
-
Burnet v. CoronadoSearch
-
Green, 355 U.S. at 355 U. S. 188 . Accordingly, the contrary holding of United States v. JenkinsSearch
-
of the enactment and development of the Act is set out in Mr. Justice Harlan's opinion for the Court in United States v. SissonSearch
-
Lee v. UnitedSearch
-
time of the adoption of the Constitution. A contrary ruling would have altered this Court's task in such cases as Lee v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial