Citation network
Sanabria Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 14, 1978
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Sanabria v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 437 U.S. 54 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court Sanabria v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 437 U.S. 54 (1978) Sanabria v. UnitedSearch
-
might be, there is no exception to the constitutional rule forbidding successive trials for the same offense. Fong Foo v. UnitedSearch
-
numbers evidence was erroneously excluded, the judgment of acquittal produced thereby is final and unreviewable. Lee v. UnitedSearch
-
Jeffers v. UnitedSearch
-
after a prosecution is terminated by a defendant's request for a mistrial. Id. at 7-8, citing United States v. DinitzSearch
-
We now reverse. Page 437 U. S. 63 II In United States v. WilsonSearch
-
United States v. MartinSearch
-
Linen Supply Co., 430 U. S. 564 , 430 U. S. 571 (1977), quoting United States v. BallSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Fong Foo v. UnitedSearch
-
Green v. UnitedSearch
-
actually happened, not from what a party might have done from the vantage of hindsight. See Central Tablet Mfg. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Cochran v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 157 U. S. 286 , 157 U. S. 290 (1895), quoted with approval in Russell v. UnitedSearch
-
Hagner v. UnitedSearch
-
exalted over substance in determining the double jeopardy consequences of a ruling terminating a prosecution, Serfass v. UnitedSearch
-
neither is it appropriate entirely to ignore the form of order entered by the trial court, see United States v. BarberSearch
-
acquittal on the single count charged. No language in the indictment was ordered to be stricken, compare United States v. AlbertiSearch
-
Here, the District Court did not find that the count failed to charge a necessary element of the offense, cf. Lee v. UnitedSearch
-
prosecution on any aspect of the count, and hence bars appellate review of the trial court's error. United States v. MartinSearch
-
Green v. UnitedSearch
-
Few, if any, limitations are imposed by the Double Jeopardy Clause on the legislative power to define offenses. Brown v. OhioSearch
-
United States v. UniversalSearch
-
Bell v. UnitedSearch
-
Braverman v. UnitedSearch
-
acts of gambling as independent federal offenses. See H.R.Rep. No. 91-1549, p. 53 (1970). See also Iannelli v. UnitedSearch
-
Lee v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 432 U.S. at 432 U. S. 30 n. 8, quoting United States v. MartinSearch
-
Brown v. OhioSearch
-
is quite similar to an unsuccessful argument that it presented in Braverman v. UnitedSearch
-
the legal rulings leading to that judgment might be. The Government nevertheless argues, relying principally on Lee v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 432 U. S. 23 (1977), and Jeffers v. UnitedSearch
-
Court of Appeals that this case does not present the hypothetical situation on which we reserved judgment in Serfass v. UnitedSearch
-
from defense motions -- that lead to the termination of a criminal trial in the defendant's favor. See United States v. WilsonSearch
-
to an acquittal would undercut the adversary assumption on which our system of criminal justice rests, see Jeffers v. UnitedSearch
-
court's rulings here led to an erroneous resolution in the defendant's favor on the merits of the charge. As Fong Foo v. UnitedSearch
-
Commonwealth v. BoyleSearch
-
ruling excluding evidence occurred after the defendant had been put in jeopardy and before verdict. Cf. United States v. MorrisonSearch
-
was filed one day out of time. The time requirement of this Court's Rule 22 (2) is not jurisdictional, Schacht v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 420 U. S. 370 . See Lee v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Sanabria v. UnitedSearch
-
II In United States v. WilsonSearch
-
See Central Tablet Mfg. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Russell v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial