Citation network
United States Vs. Grayson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 26, 1978
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 41 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. GraysonSearch
-
U.S. 41 (1978) United States v. GraysonSearch
-
Williams v. NewSearch
-
Two judges concluded that this result was mandated by language in a prior decision of the Third Circuit, Poteet v. FaltierSearch
-
U.S. 816 (1977). We reverse. II In Williams v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 49 Constitutional challenges were leveled at judicial reliance on such information, however. In Williams v. NewSearch
-
authority may legitimately consider the evidence heard during trial, as well as the demeanor of the accused. Chaffin v. StynchcombeSearch
-
Humes v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. HendrixSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
one Circuit has directly rejected the probative value of the defendant's false testimony in his own defense. In Scott v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MooreSearch
-
Morissette v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 342 U. S. 246 , 342 U. S. 250 (1952). See also Blocker v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. WongSearch
-
cannot assist his client in presenting what the attorney has reason to believe is false testimony. See Holloway v. ArkansasSearch
-
Compare the decision in the present case, 550 F.2d 103 (1977), and Scott v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 377, 419 F.2d 264 (1969), with United States v. HendrixSearch
-
United States v. MooreSearch
-
United States v. NunnSearch
-
United States v. LevineSearch
-
Hess v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. CluchetteSearch
-
and Humes v. UnitedSearch
-
cites this Court's decision in Williams v. NewSearch
-
sentencing judge's discretion to consider a wide range of information in arriving at an appropriate sentence, Williams v. NewSearch
-
argue against correcting an erroneous sentencing policy that is apparent on the face of the record. Cf. Bordenkircher v. HayesSearch
-
U. S. 806 , 422 U. S. 819 , surely must encompass the right to testify in his own behalf. See Ferguson v. GeorgiaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. GraysonSearch
-
of the Third Circuit, Poteet v. FaltierSearch
-
II In Williams v. NewSearch
-
Sullivan v. AsheSearch
-
In Williams v. NewSearch
-
In Scott v. UnitedSearch
-
Blocker v. UnitedSearch
-
See Holloway v. ArkansasSearch
-
and Scott v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Bordenkircher v. HayesSearch
-
See Ferguson v. GeorgiaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial