Citation network
Furnco Constr. Corp. Vs. Waters
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 29, 1978
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 567 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court Furnco Constr. Corp. v. WatersSearch
-
U.S. 567 (1978) Furnco Constr. Corp. v. WatersSearch
-
Court held, inter alia, that respondents had not proved a case of discrimination under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSearch
-
theory of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSearch
-
theory of Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
the District Court concluded that respondents had failed to make out a Title VII claim under the doctrine of Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
respondents had failed to Page 438 U. S. 573 prove a case of discrimination under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSearch
-
Id. at 411 U. S. 802 n. 13. See Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
if otherwise unexplained, are more likely than not based on the consideration of impermissible factors. See Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
workforce cannot immunize an employer from liability for specific acts of discrimination. As we said in Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySearch
-
regard to whether members of the applicant's race are already proportionately represented in the workforce. See Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
McDonald v. SantaSearch
-
Batiste v. FurncoSearch
-
This case did not involve employment tests, which we dealt with in Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
Power Co., 401 U. S. 424 (1971), and in Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySearch
-
or particularized requirements such as the height and weight specifications considered in Dothard v. RawlinsonSearch
-
case like Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
of employment discrimination because of race may arise in two different Page 438 U. S. 582 ways. Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
the Court of Appeals was correct in treating this as a disparate treatment case controlled by McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSearch
-
General Electric Co. v. GilbertSearch
-
Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
Co., 401 U. S. 424 , 401 U. S. 430 401 U. S. 432 (1971). As set out by the Court in Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Furnco Constr. Corp. v. WatersSearch
-
of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSearch
-
of Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
See Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
See Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
Dothard v. RawlinsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial